It's called Real Life, the graphics is best, but the gameplay sucks.
well, I could argue that monitor has the best graphics, because that is the device which displays things generated by gpu ;)
I can only guess photorealistic graphics is not a matter of this decade, even top-end PC hardware is ridiculously weak to be capable of REALTIME photorealistic graphics at decent framerate - for ex. this short animation less than one and half minute long of 1920x817 resolution took 4 MONTHS NON-STOP to render (which equals to about 1 frame per 24 hours,
so in order to make this realtime 60fps, about 5184000x more powerful PC would be needed
Saying PC has better graphics is not inaccurate in terms of gaming. Often times it allows for higher settings than a console would be able to cope with. The only issue with terminology is when gamers talk about visuals and graphics like they're the same thing. There are games with garbage graphics that look amazing, and vice versa.