Ryzen R7 vs Skylake-X in Battlefield 1 (1700 versus 7800X)
Written by: GreedyMuffin - 16:38 Aug-10-2017

Ryzen R7 vs Skylake-X in Battlefield 1

Disclamer: The Ryzen benches are over a month old.

 

The setup(s): I7 7800X, MSI X299 Tomhawk, 2x8GB Corsair Vengance 3200 mhz, 1080Ti, AX1500I, Samsung 840 Pro, Windows 10

 

R7 1700, X370 Crosshair 6, 2x8GB Corsair Vengance 3200 mhz, 1080Ti, AX1500I, Samsung 840 Pro, Windows 10

 

I tested first Ryzen on the map in Battlefield called "Soissons". Later I tested the SK-X setup on some other maps. Someone said I needed to test the same map as performance may vary, and they were right..

The Ryzen setup was clocked at 3850 mhz which was the max 24/7 OC I could do.. The memory was set to 2933 as the Ryzen would not post with the default 3200. The GPU was at 2050/+500 mem.

The 7800X was clocked at 4700 which is not the max 24/7 OC. But a nice clockspeed considering powerdraw, voltage and temperatures. The memory was set at 3200 mhz. GPU was also at 2050/+500 on mem. 

 

Both systems are identical expect the motherboard/CPU. Both systems were under custom water.

 

Results are on a 64 players conquest on the map called "Sessions" (Which is a lighter resource demanding map to play on IMHO..)

 

I7 7800X: Min FPS 114 - Max FPS 173 - Avg FPS 141 - 64 players Conquest on Soissons - Ultra preset - 1440P

 

R7 1700: MIN FPS 91 - Max FPS 174 - Avg FPS 115 - 64 players Conquest on Soissons - Ultra preset - 1440P

 

I've owned 3470 - 4670K - 4770K - 5820K - 5960X - 4790K - 6700K - 7700K - 1700 - 7800X.

I am open to answer any questions you might have. I sold the Ryzen system a few days ago. So can't do any more test on the Ryzen system. 

I've recorded more benchmarks on BF1, and the results were similar all around. So no, this is not a one case scenario. 

I've benchmarked every system the same way as the first.


Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion
View all discussions Formatting Help
X
Formatting Syntax Result
Bold **bold text** __more bold text__ bold text more bold text
Italic *italic text* _more italic text_ italic text more italic text
Strikethrough ~~strikethrough text~~ strikethrough text
Links [Game-Debate](http://www.game-debate.com) Game-Debate
Ordered List Press return twice to start your list

1. List item the first
2. List item the second
3. List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  1. List item the first
  2. List item the second
  3. List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Unordered Lists Press return twice to start your list

* List item the first
* List item the second
* List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  • List item the first
  • List item the second
  • List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Code Blocks `alert('hello world!');` alert('hello world!');
Quote Blocks > 'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
New - Ordered by date, the newest comments at the top
1
0
aditrex's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2666MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
5
/
338

gd says 7800x 29% better then r5 1600 ridiculous

0
GreedyMuffin's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
7
/
167

What do you mean by that..? :)

2
psychoman's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
Phone
8
/
412

Nope. The i7 7800x has much higher clock speeds(24% higher clock speeds), BF1 benefit from Hyper-Threading, but NOT from AMDs SMT, I've even seen that it ran better on Ryzen without SMT and BF does NOT scale in performance with more than 4-6 cores.


And you tested the multiplayer, which you can NOT test consistently, you can NOT do the same thing twice in a multiplayer game, mainly because there are 63 other random factors, a.k.a people.

2
psychoman's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
Phone
8
/
412

And yes, basically the difference in FPS is the difference in clock speeds.
22% difference in average, 24% in the minimum and the max is GPU limited.

0
GreedyMuffin's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
7
/
167

You don't get a linear improvement. But this is something I can test.


I know MP is hard to bench due to all the different variations, but the bottom line is still the same. The results were similar across all of the maps on both the systems. And with that I mean,


I've tested several benches on both system. The results are very similar all across the tests.

0
psychoman's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
Phone
8
/
412

Yes when you increase clock speeds as long as the software is well written you do get linear improvements when rising the clock speeds.
In this case BF1 scales well with up to 6 cores and is well optimized, so it does scale linearly.

0
Myrmiron's Rig
Saved at: Aug-22-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3600 x 1050
width x height
10
/
77

Can you do the same benchmark but with the 7800X clocked at 3850MHz?
I'd like to see if these lower benchmarks are due to Ryzen or due to the lower clock speeds of Ryzen.

0
GreedyMuffin's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
7
/
167

A Ryzen at 4800-5000 (+ some high speed memory) would probably be trading blows. The IPC is slower, but the MT systems on Ryzen is stronger than Intel's HT as far as I've understood.

0
lion94's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR2 667MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
12
/
130

great buddy.


can you do gta 5?


thanks

1
GreedyMuffin's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
7
/
167

Sorry mate, but as I wrote, the Ryzen system is sold.


I could still test GTA though..

0
lion94's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR2 667MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
12
/
130

no problem

0
psychoman's Rig
Saved at: Aug-21-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
Phone
8
/
412

GTA V will run better on intel, cuz it's obviously intel optimized, no need to benchmark it really.

1
GreedyMuffin avatar

Member bio

Name: GreedyMuffin
Rank: 8
Title: Junior Ed.
Blog Views: 6,502
7
/
167
Title
Hits
Date

1046
Mar-05-2017

1253
Apr-05-2015

1012
Dec-22-2014

640
Nov-07-2014

View all by this member
View all