Intel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz
Intel Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz
Select any two CPUs for comparison
Gaming Performance Comparison
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz is noticeably better than the Intel Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz was released over a year more recently than the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz, and so the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.
The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz has a 0.3 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, the two CPUs are too similar to judge.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
Both the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz have the same TDP of 35 Watts, but the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz has a lower lithography size, and so will affect your yearly electricity bills less adversely.
The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz and the Core i3-2310M 2.1GHz both have an on-board GPU, which means that they will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card.
For an in-depth GPU comparison, click on the GPU comparison icon that you can find throughout Game-Debate:
On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.
|Mini Review||Ivy Bridge is the codename for Intel's 22 nm die shrink of the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture based on tri-gate ("3D") transistors. Ivy Bridge processors will be backwards-compatible with the Sandy Bridge platform, but might require a firmware update (vendor specific). Intel has released new 7-series Panther Point chipsets with integrated USB 3.0 to complement Ivy Bridge.Intel announced that volume production of Ivy Bridge chips began in the third quarter of 2011. Quad-core and dual-core-mobile models launched on April 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 respectively. Meanwhile, Core i3 desktop processors are said to arrive in the third quarter of 2012.||The 2nd gen Intel® Core™ mobile processor family delivers a visibly smarter PC experience. Whether you use your PC for digital media, gaming, play, or everyday tasks, these new processors deliver even more performance automatically when you need it and now offer a better visual PC experience built-in. The 2nd gen Intel Core mobile processors make it easier for you to design, edit, play, share, and enjoy—smarter than ever before. With Intel® Turbo Boost Technology1 2.0 the processor intelligently increases your PC’s speed when you need it. The 2nd gen Intel Core mobile processor family also includes built-in visuals, a rich set of new features for a stunning and seamless visual PC experience with no additional hardware required. Also featured is Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology2, which enables each processor core to work on two tasks at the same time, delivering the smart multitasking performance you need to move between applications quickly. That’s visibly smart performance with a boost|