|Recommended System Requirements|
|Game||Core i7-4820K 4-Core 3.70GHz||Xeon E3-1230 v2|
|Watch Dogs 2||9%||1%|
|Need For Speed||12%||2%|
|Forza Horizon 3||12%||2%|
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i7-4820K 4-Core 3.70GHz is significantly better than the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Core i7-4820K 4-Core was released over a year more recently than the Xeon E3-1230 v2, and so the Core i7-4820K 4-Core is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.
Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).
The Core i7-4820K 4-Core and the Xeon E3-1230 v2 both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.
Both the Intel Core i7-4820K 4-Core 3.70GHz and the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 have the same number of threads. Both the Core i7-4820K 4-Core and the Xeon E3-1230 v2 use hyperthreading. The Core i7-4820K 4-Core has 2 logical threads per physical core and the Xeon E3-1230 v2 has 2.
Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Core i7-4820K 4-Core and Xeon E3-1230 v2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i7-4820K 4-Core has a 0.4 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Core i7-4820K 4-Core and the Xeon E3-1230 v2 have the same L2 cache size, but the Core i7-4820K 4-Core has a 2 MB bigger L3 cache, so in this area, it wins out over the Xeon E3-1230 v2.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 61 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i7-4820K 4-Core (though they were created with the same size 22 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Xeon E3-1230 v2 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
|CPU Codename||Ivy Bridge-E||Ivy Bridge-H2|
|MoBo Socket||LGA 2011/Socket R||LGA 1155/Socket H2|
|Release Date||01 Nov 2013||14 May 2012|
|CPU Link||GD Link||GD Link|
|Clock Speed||3.7 GHz||vs||3.3 GHz|
|Turbo Frequency||3.9 GHz||vs||3.7 GHz|
|Max TDP||130 W||vs||69 W|
|Lithography||22 nm||vs||22 nm|
|Bit Width||64 Bit||vs||64 Bit|
|L1 Cache Size||256 KB||vs||256 KB|
|L2 Cache Size||1024 KB||vs||1024 KB|
|L3 Cache Size||10 MB||vs||8 MB|
|Max Memory Size||-||vs||32 GB|
|ECC Memory Support||no||vs||no|
|Base GPU Frequency||-||vs||-|
|Max GPU Frequency||-||vs||-|
|Mini Review||Core i7-4820K 4-Core 3.7GHz is an extreme processor based on the 22nm, Ivy Bridge architecture. |
It offers 4 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.7GHz, which may go up to 3.9GHz and 10MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated and the processor has multiplier unlocked.
The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 130W.
Compared to Core i7-4770K there's an overall 3% performance decrease. Its performance is very good and sufficient for extreme gaming.
|Xeon E3-1230 v2 is a Server Processor based on the 22nm, Ivy Bridge architecture. |
It offers 4 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.3GHz, which may go up to 3.7GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated.
The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics and has a rated board TDP of 69W.
Though not created for gaming purposes, its performance is exceptionally good and enough for even the most demanding applications.