|Recommended System Requirements|
|Game||APU E1-1200 Dual Core||Turion X2 Dual Core Mobile RM-74|
|Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands||1287%||799%|
|Mass Effect Andromeda||1054%||648%|
|Resident Evil 7||1453%||907%|
|Watch Dogs 2||940%||574%|
|Grand Theft Auto VI||1342%||835%|
|Sniper Elite 4||1342%||835%|
|Halo Wars 2||1287%||799%|
|Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare||1176%||727%|
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Turion X2 Dual Core Mobile RM-74 is very slightly better than the AMD APU E1-1200 Dual Core when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The APU E1-1200 Dual was released over three years more recently than the Turion X2 Dual, and so the APU E1-1200 Dual is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Turion X2 Dual when running the latest games.
The APU E1-1200 Dual and the Turion X2 Dual both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the APU E1-1200 Dual and the Turion X2 Dual may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The APU E1-1200 Dual and Turion X2 Dual are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Turion X2 Dual has a 0.8 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Turion X2 Dual has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the APU E1-1200 Dual, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Turion X2 Dual wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The APU E1-1200 Dual has a 17 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Turion X2 Dual, and was created with a 33 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the APU E1-1200 Dual will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
The APU E1-1200 Dual has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Turion X2 Dual, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.
On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.
|MoBo Socket||BGA413||Socket S1|
|Release Date||05 Jun 2012||01 Dec 2008|
|CPU Link||GD Link||GD Link|
|Clock Speed||1.4 GHz||vs||2.2 GHz|
|Max TDP||18 W||vs||35 W|
|Lithography||32 nm||vs||65 nm|
|Bit Width||64 Bit||vs||-|
|Voltage Range||0.875-1.35V KB||vs||-|
|L1 Cache Size||-||vs||256 KB|
|L2 Cache Size||512 KB||vs||1024 KB|
|L2 Cache Count||2||vs||-|
|L3 Cache Size||-||vs||-|
|ECC Memory Support||no||vs||no|
|Graphics||Radeon HD 7310||no|
|Base GPU Frequency||500 MHz||vs||-|
|Max GPU Frequency||-||vs||-|
|Mini Review||APU E1-1200 Dual Core is a mobile processor based on the 40nm, Bobcat micro-architecture. |
It includes two Bobcat cores at 1.4GHz and integrated Radeon HD 7310 Graphics, with 80 Shader Processing Units, clocked at 500MHz. The processor supports memory up to DDR3-1066 single channelled memory.
It only consumes up to 18 Watt but performs considerably worse when compared to Intel ULV Ivy Bridge processors.
|Turion 64 X2 is AMD's 64-bit dual-core mobile CPU, intended to compete with Intel's Core and Core 2 CPUs. The Turion 64 X2 was launched on May 17, 2006, after several delays. These processors use Socket S1, and feature DDR2 memory. They also include AMD Virtualization Technology and more power-saving features. AMD first produced the Turion 64 X2 on IBM's 90 nm Silicon on insulator (SOI) process (cores with the Taylor codename). As of May 2007, they have switched to a 65 nm Silicon-Germanium stressed process, which was recently achieved through the combined effort of IBM and AMD, with 40% improvement over comparable 65 nm processes. The earlier 90 nm devices were codenamed Taylor and Trinidad, while the newer 65 nm cores have codename Tyler.|