My son wants a new pc for combined xmas / birthday gift. He wants something good enough for battlefield 3 pc game. I have got two quotes from scan one recommended for the game and one that is cheaper which should be fine. Bearing in mind these pcs are a fortune which one should I go for please.
Spec one.
Intel core i5 2500k 3.3Ghz, quad core, 6mb cache, 2nd generation intel core sandy bridge CPU professionally overclocked to 4.5Ghz, 4GM (2 x 2GB) corsair vengeance LP, DDR3 1600Mhz, 1Gb MSI GTX 560 Ti, 880Mhz GPU, 384 Cores, 4200Mhz GDDR5, 1TB Seagate Barracuda, 7200rpm, 32MB cache, microsoft windows 7 home premium 64bit OEM (think thats all the important bits),
OR:
Spec two,
Intel core i5 2400, quad core, 3.1Ghz, 6MB cache, 4GB (2 x2GB) corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600Mhz, 1GB MSI GTX 560 Ti, 880Mhz GPU, 384 cores, 4200Mhz GDDR5, 1 TB seagate barracuda 7200rpm, 32mb cache, SATA6, Microsoft windows 7 home premium 64bit 0EM
Now to me thats as clear as mud. I understand the first is overclocked and got a good graphics card in which will play the game and I understand the latter is not overclocked but still has the same graphics card. The diference between the two is £124. Which one should I go for and why please.
I'm sorry if this is in the wrong section, but I'm just a Mum looking for a bit of info before I get him an upgrade PC and I really haven't got a clue if I should go with spec one or spec two and if its really worth the extra money. I'm not Mrs moneybags so thats why I need more advice. Thanks in anticipation.
Karen
