Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FirePro W7000 Tesla C2075
Grand Theft Auto V 35% 75%
Assassins Creed: Unity 140% 210%
Far Cry 4 96% 153%
Dying Light 140% 210%
Dragon Ball Xenoverse 37% 19%
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 57% 103%
The Witcher III 104% 164%
Battlefield: Hardline 65% 114%
Resident Evil: Revelations 2 4% 25%
Batman: Arkham Knight 4% 25%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro W7000 are noticeably better than the Nvidia Tesla C2075.

The FirePro W7000 was released less than a year after the Tesla C2075, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Tesla C2075 has 2048 MB more video memory than the FirePro W7000, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The FirePro W7000 has 9.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Tesla C2075, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro W7000 is marginally better than the Tesla C2075.

The FirePro W7000 has 1280 Shader Processing Units and the Tesla C2075 has 448. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro W7000 is 790 and the actual shader performance of the Tesla C2075 is 515. The FirePro W7000 having 275 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro W7000 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Tesla C2075.

The FirePro W7000 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Tesla C2075. This means that the FirePro W7000 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Tesla C2075.

The FirePro W7000 requires 150 Watts to run and the Tesla C2075 requires 247 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the Tesla C2075, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro W7000. The Tesla C2075 requires 97 Watts more than the FirePro W7000 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Tesla C2075 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the FirePro W7000.

Can I Run It

information button related to GD Premium

Check any game system requirements

screen with green tick
New GD Anywhere - Compare your PC on any website

GPU Core Details

Core Speed950 MHzvs575 MHz
ArchitecturePitcairn XTFermi GF100
Notebook GPUnono
Release Date13 Jun 201201 Jul 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth153.6GB/secvs144GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 768 KB

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1280vs448
Actual Shader Performance790vs515
Texture Mapping Units80vs-
Texture Rate76 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units32vs-
Pixel Rate30.4 GPixel/svs-

GPU Display Tech

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.2vs4.1
Max Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Wattsvs247 Watts

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended RAM--
Recommended Screen Size--
Recommended PSU-750 Watts

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFirePro W7000 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.
It's based on the Pitcairn XT Core (same used on 7870) and therefore offers 1280 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 256-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 950MHz while the memory clock operates at 1200MHZ.
Compared to Radeon HD 7870, its central unit is slightly lower clocked and its gaming performance is even lower, as Radeon HD 7870 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro W7000 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon HD 7870.
The NVIDIA Tesla C2075 companion processor is built for GPU computing. It features 448 application-acceleration cores per board, dramatically increasing performance compared to a traditional workstation. By adding a Tesla companion processor, engineers, designers, and content creation professionals can add over one Teraflop of computing potential to their workstation.
Recommended CPU--
Possible GPU Upgrades--
GPU Variants--