Select any two GPUs for comparison
Gaming Performance Comparison
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the HD 7950 and the are equal.
The has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.
The HD 7950 was released over three years more recently than the , and so the HD 7950 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The HD 7950 has 3072 MB video memory, but the does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The HD 7950 has 5376 Shader Processing Units but the does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire requires 540 Watts to run but there is no entry for the .
Check any game system requirements
|Recommended RAM||8 GB||-|
|Recommended Screen Size||1920x1080||-|
|Mini Review||Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire is a solution of three Radeon HD 7950 put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. |
Check the page of Radeon HD 7950 to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is somewhat superior to a single Radeon HD 7990 performing by itself it might be worse (depending on whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) than a single Radeon HD 7950. Expect this combination to draw up to 540 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.