Select any two GPUs for comparison

GD Star Rating

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M390 4GB GeForce GTX 965M 2GB
Monster Hunter World 107% 107%
PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds 108% 108%
Far Cry 5 433% 433%
Grand Theft Auto VI 241% 241%
FIFA 19 54% 54%
Battlefield V 115% 115%
Assassins Creed: Odyssey 25% 25%
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 135% 135%
The Crew 2 105% 105%
Pro Evolution Soccer 2019 29% 29%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the R9 M390 and the GTX 965M are equal.

The GTX 965M has a 74 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M390, but the R9 M390 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 965M. As a result, the R9 M390 exhibits a 8.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 965M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 965M has a 74 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M390 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 965M providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M390 was released less than a year after the GTX 965M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R9 M390 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 965M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M390 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M390 has 73.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 965M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M390 is much better than the GTX 965M.

The Radeon R9 M390 4GB has 1280 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 965M 2GB has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M390 is 979 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 965M is 1017. The GTX 965M having 38 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M390 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R9 M390 4GB requires 100 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 965M 2GB requires 70 Watts. The R9 M390 requires 30 Watts more than the GTX 965M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M390 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 965M.

Can I Run It

information button related to GD Premium

Check any game system requirements


GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs924 MHz
Boost Clock900 MHzvs993 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Neptune XTMaxwell GM204-N16E
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs07 Jan 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs green tick
vs green tick
green tick vs green tick
green tick vs green tick
green tick vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth153.6GB/secvs80GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 53% green tick vs 28%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1280vs1024
Actual Shader Performance47%vs49%
Texture Mapping Units80vs64
Texture Rate68 GTexel/svs59.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate27.2 GPixel/svs29.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power100 Wattsvs70 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4810MQ 4-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-4710MQ 4-Core 2.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M390 4GB is a High-End Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).

Radeon R9 M390 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Neptune XT which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Curacao XT GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R9 270X.
Neptune XT has 20 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 1280 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

The Central Unit is Clocked at 850MHz and goes up to 900MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1200MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 100W, it is suited for very large laptops.

Radeon R9 M390X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M290X 4GB.
Performance is Comparable to the desktop Radeon R9 270.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M390 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 965M 2GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Maxwell architecture.

GeForce GTX 965M 2GB Equips the GPU Codenamed GM204-N16E-GS which is a Second Gen Maxwell GPU and has 8 SM activated. It offers 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

The central unit runs at 924MHz and goes up to 950MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1253MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The Frame Buffer was doubled to 2GB. This is adequate for 1080p Gaming in most Games.

Power Consumption
GeForce GTX 965M 2GB has a Rated Board TDP of 50W.

GeForce GTX 965M 2GB proves to be incredible fast at resolutions up to 1920x1080. In fact, even at 1920x1080 it matches the older GeForce GTX 870M.
Above 1920x1080, GeForce GTX 965M 2GB's performance decreases significantly and becomes further distant from the higher positioned GeForce GTX 970M.
Nevertheless, all modern games should run comfortably at 1080p. It can be said its performance lies somewhere between a desktop GeForce GTX 660 and a Radeon R9 270 which are both powerful Graphics Cards.

System Suggestions
We Recommend a High-End Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPUIntel Core i5-6200U 2.3GHz
Intel Core i7-820QM 4-Core 1.73GHz
Intel Core i3-6167U 2.7GHz
Intel Core i3-6100H 2.7GHz
Intel Core i5-5350U 1.8GHz
Intel Core i7-4800MQ 4-Core 2.7GHz
Intel Core i7-4860HQ 4-Core 2.4GHz
Intel Core i7-4950HQ 4-Core 2.4GHz
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4-Core 2.6GHz
Intel Core i7-3840QM 4-Core 2.8GHz
Possible GPU UpgradesN/AN/A
GPU Variants--