GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB
Login to compare your own system with this hardware
GeForce_GTX_980_Ti_6GB
FPS System Benchmark
92 FPS
High
Nvidia PC game performance check GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB
GPU
Architecture
Maxwell GM200-310-A1
Process
28nm
TMUs
176
Texture Rate
189 GTexel/s
ROPs
96
Pixel Rate
103 GPixel/s
Shader
Processing Units (Cuda Cores)
2816
Driver Support
golden star golden star golden star golden star golden star
Release Price
$649.00
Compatibility
Direct X
DX 12.1
Shader
5.0
Open GL
4.5
Resolution (WxH)
5120x3200
Notebook GPU
SLI/Crossfire
Dedicated
Integrated
Memory
Memory
6144 MB
Memory Speed
1753 MHz
Memory Bus
384 Bit
Memory Type
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
336.6GB/sec
L2 Cache
3072KB
Display Connectors
VGA Connection
0
DVI Connection
1
HDMI Connection
1
DisplayPort Connection
3
Clock Speeds
Core Speed
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
Power
Max Power
250 Watts
PSU
600 Watt & 42 Amps
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Recommended Hardware
Best RAM Match
16 GB
Best Resolution
2560 x 1600
GPU Upgrade
Resolution Performance
1366x768 1600x900 1920x1080 2560x1440 3840x2160
10
10
10
8.5
6.6
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB Game Requirement Analysis

Overview
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB is an Enthusiast Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Maxwell architecture.


Architecture
The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.
The Second Revision of Maxwell also adds VXGI (Voxel Global Illumination) which makes scenes significantly more lifelike and believable as light interacts more realistically in the game environment and the MFAA technology which provides the same effect as MSAA but at a much lower performance cost.


GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM200-310-A1 which has 22 SM activated and thus 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 96 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1076MHz, in Turbo Mode.


Memory
The GPU accesses a 6GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 384-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1753MHz.


Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 250W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with one available 6-pin and one available 8-pin connectors.


Performance
Benchmarks Indicate its performance is slightly above AMD's Dual Radeon R9 295X2 at 1920x1080 but at any resolution above that, the latter proves to be faster.
As expected, $999 GeForce GTX Titan X is also slightly faster but GeForce GTX 980 is beaten in around 20%.
Even so, GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB is not a competitive product because a solution of two GeForce GTX 970 in SLI is still much faster and doesn't come at a much higher cost ($658 against $649).


System Suggestions
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1600. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.


Source [Pip]
Compare the GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB to any other GPU
GPU:
Laptop: NoYes
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB GPU Variants
Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion
View all discussions Formatting Help
X
Formatting Syntax Result
Bold **bold text** __more bold text__ bold text more bold text
Italic *italic text* _more italic text_ italic text more italic text
Strikethrough ~~strikethrough text~~ strikethrough text
Links [Game-Debate](http://www.game-debate.com) Game-Debate
Ordered List Press return twice to start your list

1. List item the first
2. List item the second
3. List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  1. List item the first
  2. List item the second
  3. List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Unordered Lists Press return twice to start your list

* List item the first
* List item the second
* List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  • List item the first
  • List item the second
  • List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Code Blocks `alert('hello world!');` alert('hello world!');
Quote Blocks > 'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
New - Ordered by date, the newest comments at the top
1 2 3
0
Argies's Rig
Saved at: Dec-16-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
5760 x 1080
width x height
0
/
5

Would having this on SLI be bottlenecked by my I7 4790?

0
Tero's Rig
Saved at: May-11-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
32GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
8
/
2,000

Definitely not, check out my rig :)

1
AoAuraStiXxA's Rig
Saved at: May-25-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
Phone
1
/
19

Huh, ranking based on 1440p now instead of 1080?

0
Komodo's Rig
Saved at: May-25-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
2
/
15

Yep… i noticed that 2.

0
germanator1313's Rig
Saved at: Jan-19-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
RAM
16GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
0

Would this even be a worthy upgrade? Prices should drop with the 1080 release so considering it.

2
Igor123's Rig
Saved at: May-24-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
32GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
/
34

Get GTX 1070. It's better card for less money.

-1
LSDgaming's Rig
Saved at: May-22-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
25

Even better, try GTX 1060 MSI Gaming X 6G Edition for better performance per dollar.

0
ichlasss's Rig
Saved at: May-25-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
RAM
16GB DDR4 2666MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
0

why asus poseidon 980 Ti is not listed, do the same with the GeForce GTX 980 Ti Asus 6GB Edition?

0
zohaiby's Rig
Saved at: May-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1024 x 768
width x height
0
/
0

if i upgrade to 8gb ram then can my pc handle this card, my power supply is 600w

1
Noraiman's Rig
Saved at: Feb-12-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
FX-8350 oc: 5%
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
-1
/
11

You will have some serious bottlenecking. You should have at least an i7 2nd gen forr this.

2
lion94's Rig
Saved at: May-26-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR2 667MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
116

it will be close but i think 650 watts should be minimum.


also try to buy core i7 2600

0
danynatorBG's Rig
Saved at: May-19-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
1
/
7

If OC to lets say 3.5Ghz and you play on 4k you will get same FPS like playing on 1080p with same settings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS-yXIAiFQw

0
gamesplayer85's Rig
Saved at: Feb-01-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height
0
/
71

If i go to heaven the only thing i want waiting for me is this Godly motherf*cker

0
LSDgaming's Rig
Saved at: May-22-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
25

But my motherf*cker is better than this one.

0
gamesplayer85's Rig
Saved at: Feb-01-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height
0
/
71

Lol i can see that :D

0
SooneX's Rig
Saved at: Jun-22-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
32GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
-1
/
-96

will my cpu bottleneck this card

0
Salazar33's Rig
Saved at: Mar-30-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
-11

you won't see any deference, just one or two fps. any quad core cpu is good

0
Mario2x2's Rig
Saved at: May-26-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3200MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
2
/
45

I am pretty sure my quad core cpu would bottleneck this card alot.

1
ninjaone001's Rig
Saved at: May-23-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
32GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
2

I finally got one oh yeah :D

-2
jovince92's Rig
Saved at: May-26-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
Phone
0
/
17

You must be rich

1
ninjaone001's Rig
Saved at: May-23-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
32GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
2

lol not really just had disposable income.

0
HassanDOn12312's Rig
Saved at: Jan-10-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
6GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
1

I want to grab it :(

-17
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

Too bad, Nvidia's dx12.1 gpus cannot keep up with dx12. Even a r9 290x performs identical to the 980ti when using dx12.http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/08/Review-chart-template-final-full-width-3.0011.png

4
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

Well what about all the pictures who proves diffrently? Also a picture alone does not give any validence. Here's a Unreal Engine 4 DX12 Demo were Fury X are close to peer with 980 ti. So your pic are completly bs, unless you think that a 290X beats the Fury X, lol. No nVidia and AMD are very tied in DX12 performance. Sorry to break your AMD-fanboy bubble.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=llzhKw6-s5A

1
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

the pic aint biased. check this: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/08/directx-12-tested-an-early-win-for-amd-and-disappointment-for-nvidia/

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

http://techreport.com/review/29090/fable-legends-directx-12-performance-revealed/3
Well in gaming 980 ti beats the Fury X in DX12. Also the review you posted had faults about the hardware, sorry but I don't trust a review were 5930k are labeled as a quad-core, just their your review lost all reliability.

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

I knew nVidia had problems with DX12 at first launch, but that have been fixed in latest drivers update. Please get an up to date review next time you try to prove anything, TomalKhan.

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

IDK where u got that review but damn it so wrong 980ti 37 and fury x 30? lol wut? that doesnt even come up on the 1st page of google btw the site i posted was raked 1st when i searched amd vs nvdia dx 12 comparision. So, yh i had to trust it. but the huge gap seen on your review is.. nvm its had to convience fanboys.

2
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

The review I posted were released yesterday. The reason Fabel Legends benchmark doesn't show in the first google search most likely because Ashes og Singularity have been the first and only DX12 benchmark since release. BUT Ashes of Singularity are a alpha release built on mantel, so not a fair benchmark for comparing AMD and nVidia.

2
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

The Fabrl benchmark are a more complete product, it is a beta mainly built on DX12, so all in all a much more fair benchmark for comparing AMD and nVidia. I don't know who you call a fanboy, but I think it is fair to call you an AMD fanboy. Why? You post an old and outdated benchmark, yelling AMD beats nVidia. And when new and more proper DX12 benchmark releases (proving the alpha benchmark wrong)

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

you go all in denial, starting to misbelieve the results and calling them false. Sorry, but you're the fanboy with big F here. I haven't said that AMD doesn't keep up with nVidia, I only try to show you that AMD are not as glorious and supperior to nVidia in DX12 as you seem to think. Last, 980 ti beating Fury X with 7fps are not as suprising as 980 ti scores higher than Fury X in most DX11 games.

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

Look, I based my writings from a review from a trusted site which used a trusted benchmark. The site also pointed why the nvidia cards are lacking behind in dx12 with reasonable evidence. So, I posted it here to tell people to stay away from nvidia and potentially wait for pascal. But I was no way fanboying, yes i do a

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

own a AMD card but I bought after spending hours of comparing AMD and nVdia side by side and choose AMD as it was providing more for same price but because of fanboying or sth

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

In your last post you said that you trusted the site because it was the first listed when using google search, lol. That are not the right way to validate sources. Secondly the site you posted labeled 5930k as a 4 core CPU, doesn't sound very legit to me. Last the test you trust so much might be correct, but it is an early alpha benchmark were nVidia lacked drivers for DX12.

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

Well I can do is recommend u an optician right now, as all over the site the 5930k is labbelled as 6 core. On the test specs bar, the pictures and other places as well. Well if nVdia is catching up now we will have to wait for actual dx12 games like dues EX to make a decision.

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

The Fabel benchmark are pretty fresh, a beta and after nVida launched their first DX12 drivers, giving the benchmark between AMD and nVidia more justice. The reason I called you an AMD fanboy are simply because you base all your arguments of an outdated alpha benchmark and denying the results when a newer and more up-to-date benchmark proves differently.

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

The in-game benchmark picture showed these specs: 5930k CPU @ 3,50Ghz, 4 Cores, 4 Threads.

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

The four cores shown on the benchmark can be caused by a various reasons. check:http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2543898/wrong-5930k-cores.html and http://www.overclock.net/t/1539974/solved-new-5930k-computer-is-only-detecting-4-cores-not-6

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

My point were that a benchmark aren't trusthworthy when the rig has bios or software faults. I think first criteria are that the benchmarkers have at least installed the components and bios right.

-1
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

Lol. I dont how how u earnt all that rep here but all your logic and clues were porven wrong again and again and AGAIN your benhcmark is soo biased and prolly made by a amd fanboy. Please educate yourself and learn how to collect info from trusted websites SUCH as-

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

this: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/214834-fable-legends-amd-and-nvidia-go-head-to-head-in-latest-directx-12-benchmark &#60----- from the one of the most trust worthy website and is open to public comments. Sorry to prove thatyour overpriced dx12 underperforming card is being owed by amds latest tech. Maxwell is -

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

Maxwell is really old now and no suprise that the lastest amd tech 'FURY' beats it @ dx12. here the link again http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/214834-fable-legends-amd-and-nvidia-go-head-to-head-in-latest-directx-12-benchmark jeez, just agree and move on, i know it feels bad to see a high priced card undperformin

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

g but that is why nVidia PAscal is coming up to catch up with DX12.

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

Your pretty rude and arrogant, so please just stop! I think my rep. on GD can talk for itself that most people disagree with your false impression of me.
Also Maxwell is old compared to Fur X? Allready here you lack common knowledge, Fury Xs Fiji architecture are made on GCN similar to Radeon 200 series, so technically Fury X architecture are 1 year older than 980 ti, only diffrenece are the

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

change to HBM memory. To me you sounds hurt because I back talked you in the other thread. Please get over yourself your!
Extremetech.com are more trusted because it has a comment felt? LOL, if you diden't notice the benchmark I showed had a comment felt as well. How close minded are you?

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

And no I am not the feeling bad about "underperform". 980 ti are usually made for 2k or 4k, and the test you posted show that both Fury X and 980 ti are equal on those resolution. Why do you have such hate against nVidia may I ask?

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

As a matter of fact you were proven wrong on the other thread as well. Lets end it like this life is too short to fight over gpu's and the Nvidias fanboys here have down voted me enough to prove that I an wrong.

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

You're the one starting a fight with all your bull, and selfsentred narcissism, were you dicided to be right no matter what you hear. You try to prove that Fury X beats 980 ti with a benchmark that tie both GPUs in DX12. Also I didn't gave up the other tried, but I found it impossoble to reason with you as you're too stubborn selfsentred to even argue with in the first place.

0
TomalKhan's Rig
Saved at: Mar-25-2016
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
-1
/
-16

and there a site name Alexa which u can use to compare site ratings :)

0
JoeTheBane's Rig
Saved at: Apr-16-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2800MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
0
/
16

I only see 1 or 2 fury x's in the top 100 and they are near the bottom in 3d mark firestrike, the rest are 980ti's and titan Xs. The fury X is crap :P

1
Noraiman's Rig
Saved at: Feb-12-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
FX-8350 oc: 5%
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
-1
/
11

Hi, I'm 980 ti and I find this Fury X

0
Razack's Rig
Saved at: Apr-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
1

Will my CPU able to handle this ?

0
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

GTX 970/980 would be a better match. You should get i7 for full adventage of the power in the 980 ti ;)

0
Razack's Rig
Saved at: Apr-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
1

Did i lose much power?

1
93MiChr's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
24GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
0
/
109

I had a 2600k before, and it bottlenecked my 780 ti GPU. My usage went from 64% to full load (100%) in gaming after I upgraded my CPU. The thing I tried to say is; in CPU intensive game you won't notice much difference between a 970/980 and a 980 ti with your current CPU.

0
Razack's Rig
Saved at: Apr-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
0
/
1

Okay thank you :)

0
ArmiinGM's Rig
Saved at: Dec-23-2015
Compared to your Rig
CPU
FX-6300 oc: 15%
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height
0
/
88

You could've just overclocked it madly to like 4.5-4.7Ghz to alleviate the bottleneck to a minimum.

1 2 3
Release period
01-Jun-2015
10
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB vs Avg. AAA Game System Requirements
Avg. AAA Recommended Requirements
CPU
0%
Graphics Card
43%
RAM
12GB
0%
VS
VS
Popular Game System Requirements
Game Min. Rec.
Destiny 2 75% 30%
Call of Duty: WWII 53% 24%
Grand Theft Auto VI 74% 6%
Prey (2017) 68% 30%
Mass Effect Andromeda 68% 21%
NieR: Automata 56% 44%
Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands 63% 18%
Tekken 7 63% 17%
Pro Evolution Soccer 2018 97% 85%
Take On Mars 91% 74%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB Extras
View Compatible Hardware PC Builder