Vote on new GD features
Pentium 4 1.8GHz
Login to compare your own system with this hardware
default CPU image
Release period
02-Jul-2001
Pentium 4 1.8GHz Review
The Pentium 4 brand refers to Intel's line of single-core desktop and laptop central processing units (CPUs) introduced on November 20, 2000 and shipped through August 8, 2008. They had the 7th-generation x86 microarchitecture, called NetBurst, which was the company's first all-new design since introduction of P6 microarchitecture of the Pentium Pro CPUs in 1995. NetBurst differed from the preceding P6 (Pentium III, II, etc.) by featuring a very deep instruction pipeline to achieve very high clock speeds (up to 3.8 GHz) limited only by TDPs reaching up to 115 W in 3.4 GHz ?3.8 GHz Prescott and Prescotts 2M cores . In 2004, the initial 32-bit x86 instruction set of the Pentium 4 microprocessors was extended by the 64-bit x86-64 set.
Source [Wikipedia]
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR SPONSORS.
Pentium 4 1.8GHz Performance Specification
CPU Speed
CPU Cores
CPU Codename
TDP (Power)
Lithography
Main Link
CPU Details
1.8 GHz
1 cores
Willamette
67W
180nm
Socket 423
Notebook CPU
L1 Cache
L2 Cache
L3 Cache
Approved
GD RATING
2
Compare the Pentium 4 1.8GHz to any other CPU
CPU:
Laptop: NoYes
Intel
Pentium 4
Pentium 4 1.8GHz

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion

Submit A Benchmark

Welcome. From this page you can submit a personal benchmark to GD. Once approved by GD admin everyone can search for your bench results here. The more results the more we all learn.

There are lots of free benchmark tools that test parts of your PC. Select a Type in the form to the right, then select a Tool and then select a Test. You will see a weblink appear beside your selection. Click this link to get the benchmark Tool. Try NovaBench for an all in one benchmark that is only 12Mb to download.

How To

Run your choosen Benchmark Tool on your PC, using the benchmark tool's default setting. Take a screenshot displaying the benchmark score and information displaying your rig and submit that to us.
Example Screenshot

Discussion Page 1
Yamadron
19:11 Oct-06-2011

Yamadron's Rig
Saved at: May-06-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1600 x 900
width x height

I remember going up with the Multiplier from 14X to 18X @ Stock Voltage on 200MHz Bus speed, then going up with the FSB to 250 MHz. Then increasing the voltage and going up with the FSB again till 5 GHz.

Like that:

- 14 x 200 MHz = 2800 GHz

- 18 x 200 MHz = 3600 MHz

- Lot of increments here..

- 18 x 250 MHz = 4500 MHz

- going up with the voltage

- 18 x 270 MHz = 4860 MHz

- going up with the voltage again

- 18 x 278 MHz = 5004 MHz

- going up with the voltage for the third time

- BOOM.. No longer works

SauceBoss
18:56 Oct-06-2011

you overclocked via multiplier or with the speed?? i think intel had unlocked cpu back then. or was it after intel decided to lock them up for the overclocking customer

Yamadron
18:48 Oct-06-2011

Yamadron's Rig
Saved at: May-06-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1600 x 900
width x height

Nah.. I came second after another competitor won the event by just 0.1 Ghz more. He acheivied 5.1 GHz. Sadly, mine dead after it reached the 5.0 GHz.. lol

SauceBoss
18:44 Oct-06-2011

oh that makes stuff alittlebit clearer.

you won the bet atleast?

Yamadron
18:28 Oct-06-2011

Yamadron's Rig
Saved at: May-06-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1600 x 900
width x height

 @SauceBoss I have used Liquid Cooling to be able to acheive that OC.. but after It reached 5.0 GHz the Processor died although temps were not that high... About the stability, No need to test its stability. It was just an OC Competition to see the Maximum OC before teh CPU die.. There was no Windows to test on it..

Pip
18:07 Oct-06-2011

reaper15058832 its the nature of maths and occurs when using a single percent to display multiple points of information. These are the only details provided by Felix and an underlying mechanic of GD

Hellfire_zg
16:25 Oct-06-2011

This would eat Battlefield 3 for breakfast :D

The_ReApEr_ZA
12:16 Oct-06-2011

The_ReApEr_ZA's Rig
Saved at: May-02-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

@pip....

 

Your cpu is 96% better than this one....and mine is 92% better than this one....but your cpu is a 103% better than mine???? Your cpu should be like a 180 better than this one....

Pip
09:06 Oct-06-2011

My CPU is 96% better than this lol

LittleGamer
13:22 Feb-14-2013

LittleGamer's Rig
Saved at: May-20-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height
My CPU is 75% better than this :o
SauceBoss
04:23 Oct-06-2011

@yamadron

and it was still stable at that speed/?/ also on what temputers was it running?? 150 degrees?

Discussion Page 1