Pentium 4 3.8GHz
Login to compare your own system with this hardware
default CPU image
Release period
31-Oct-2004
Pentium 4 3.8GHz Review
The Pentium 4 brand refers to Intel's line of single-core desktop and laptop central processing units (CPUs) introduced on November 20, 2000 and shipped through August 8, 2008. They had the 7th-generation x86 microarchitecture, called NetBurst, which was the company's first all-new design since introduction of P6 microarchitecture of the Pentium Pro CPUs in 1995. NetBurst differed from the preceding P6 (Pentium III, II, etc.) by featuring a very deep instruction pipeline to achieve very high clock speeds (up to 3.8 GHz) limited only by TDPs reaching up to 115 W in 3.4 GHz ?3.8 GHz Prescott and Prescotts 2M cores . In 2004, the initial 32-bit x86 instruction set of the Pentium 4 microprocessors was extended by the 64-bit x86-64 set.
Source [Wikipedia]
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR SPONSORS.
Pentium 4 3.8GHz Performance Specification
CPU Speed
CPU Cores
CPU Codename
TDP (Power)
Lithography
Main Link
CPU Details
3.8 GHz
1 cores
Prescott-2M
115W
90nm
LGA 775/ Socket T
Notebook CPU
L1 Cache
L2 Cache
L3 Cache
Approved
GD RATING
4
Compare the Pentium 4 3.8GHz to any other CPU
CPU:
Laptop: NoYes
Intel
Pentium 4
Pentium 4 3.8GHz

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion

Submit A Benchmark

Welcome. From this page you can submit a personal benchmark to GD. Once approved by GD admin everyone can search for your bench results here. The more results the more we all learn.

There are lots of free benchmark tools that test parts of your PC. Select a Type in the form to the right, then select a Tool and then select a Test. You will see a weblink appear beside your selection. Click this link to get the benchmark Tool. Try NovaBench for an all in one benchmark that is only 12Mb to download.

How To

Run your choosen Benchmark Tool on your PC, using the benchmark tool's default setting. Take a screenshot displaying the benchmark score and information displaying your rig and submit that to us.
Example Screenshot

Discussion Page 1
NFSwhiplash
02:29 Jul-26-2011

NFSwhiplash's Rig
Saved at: May-14-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

3.8 GHz ... Makes sence.

BananaBlaster2019
10:20 Aug-09-2012

BananaBlaster2019's Rig
Saved at: May-19-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
2GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height
Right... I have to ask you by the way, is 3.8 Ghz 1 core equal to 1.9 Ghz Dual core? Processors of same class.
Codrut
20:19 Sep-22-2012

Codrut's Rig
Saved at: Sep-27-2012
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1024 x 768
width x height
memory cache , FSB speed , lithography technology , TDP is also very VERY important
if they have same specs (cache , fsp etc) but only CPU cores and CPU speed isn't same , ex :
3.8 Ghz vs 1.9 Ghz Dual Core I will say 3.8 Ghz is better because
1.9 Ghz you should amplify with x1.6 not 2.0
Codrut
20:22 Sep-22-2012

Codrut's Rig
Saved at: Sep-27-2012
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1024 x 768
width x height
I can show you this : http://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?pid=461&cpu=Celeron%20450%202.2GHz
this CPU have 2.2 Ghz and 1 core but is better than Pentium 4 with 3.8 Ghz and 1 core too because they don't use same technology ;)
zivko96
17:35 Jul-25-2011

zivko96's Rig
Saved at: Mar-03-2012
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
3GB DDR2 800MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1280 x 1024
width x height

it is beter than any Pentium D

 

Discussion Page 1