Pentium D 830 3.0GHz
Login to compare your own system with this hardware
default CPU image
Release period
26-May-2005
Pentium D 830 3.0GHz Review
In April 2005, Intel's biggest rival, AMD, had x86 dual-core microprocessors intended for workstations and servers on the market, and was poised to launch a comparable product intended for desktop computers. As a response, Intel developed Smithfield, the first x86 dual-core microprocessor intended for desktop computers, beating AMD's Athlon 64 X2 by a few weeks. Intel first launched Smithfield on April 16, 2005 in the form of the 3.2 GHz Hyper-threading enabled Pentium Extreme Edition 840. On May 26, 2005, Intel launched the mainstream Pentium D branded processor lineup with initial clock speeds of 2.8, 3.0, and 3.2 GHz with model numbers of 820, 830, and 840 respectively. In March 2006, Intel launched the last Smithfield processor, the entry-level Pentium D 805, clocked at 2.66 GHz with a 533 MT/s bus. The relatively cheap 805 was found to be highly overclockable; 3.5 GHz was often possible with good air cooling. Running it at over 4 GHz was possible with water cooling, and at this speed the 805 outperformed the top-of-the-line processors (May 2006) from both major CPU manufacturers (the AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 and Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965) in many benchmarks including power consumption.
Source [Wikipedia]
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR SPONSORS.
Pentium D 830 3.0GHz Performance Specification
CPU Speed
CPU Cores
CPU Codename
TDP (Power)
Lithography
Main Link
Sys. Bus Speed
CPU Details
3 GHz
2 cores
Smithfield
130W
90nm
LGA 775/ Socket T
1066
Notebook CPU
L1 Cache
L2 Cache
L3 Cache
Approved
GD RATING
4
Compare the Pentium D 830 3.0GHz to any other CPU
CPU:
Laptop: NoYes
Intel
Pentium D
Pentium D 830 3.0GHz

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion

Submit A Benchmark

Welcome. From this page you can submit a personal benchmark to GD. Once approved by GD admin everyone can search for your bench results here. The more results the more we all learn.

There are lots of free benchmark tools that test parts of your PC. Select a Type in the form to the right, then select a Tool and then select a Test. You will see a weblink appear beside your selection. Click this link to get the benchmark Tool. Try NovaBench for an all in one benchmark that is only 12Mb to download.

How To

Run your choosen Benchmark Tool on your PC, using the benchmark tool's default setting. Take a screenshot displaying the benchmark score and information displaying your rig and submit that to us.
Example Screenshot

Discussion Page 1
taxiku
04:35 Aug-13-2012

taxiku's Rig
Saved at: Oct-16-2012
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR2 0MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1024 x 768
width x height
I have this Processor, but I don't like it because this not good for gaming I think,,, :)
133forgottten
14:44 Sep-18-2012

133forgottten's Rig
Saved at: May-19-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1440 x 900
width x height
Any dual core CPU is fine for gaming
Naveen2195
14:48 Sep-18-2012

yes......
but some games are cpu dependent.
u need better cpu to MAX it
dimi99
20:00 Feb-17-2012

dimi99's Rig
Saved at: Dec-19-2012
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
12GB DDR3 2000MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
good procesor i have it :)
Mark
14:38 Feb-18-2012

Mark's Rig
Saved at: May-19-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
3GB DDR2 667MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1440 x 900
width x height
Yeah, it's not a CPU you want these days anymore, but it was a nice one back in the years! I had the Intel Pentium D 820 which was the same as this one, but only 0.2 GHz slower! I loved it, but needed to upgrade to another one. Now I love my E8400 :)
Discussion Page 1