Crysis 3 Nvidia GTX 680 and Intel HD 4000 Onboard Graphics Benchmarks
Written by Felix Nova on 30 January 2013 at 21:40

Crysis 3 multiplayer beta is in full swing and we are running benchmarks on all sorts of systems to see what can run Crysis 3 and what settings you might be able to play comfortably on.

We will be looking at a broad cross section of graphics cards at various graphics settings, including the ancient but mighty Nvidia 8800 GTX. We even take a look at Intels onboard GPU Intel HD 4000 to see how that benchmarks against Crysis 3 Multiplayer Beta...

If you missed the other two sections to this Crysis 3 analysis then head over and take a look

Part two: Crysis 3 Nvidia GTX 560 Ti, AMD 6970 And 660 Ti SLI Benchmarks

Part three: Crysis 3 AMD HD 5770, Nvidia GTX 680 SLI AND GTX 660 TI Graphics Benchmarks

The first thing to mention is that Crysis 3 is only just in open beta and the purpose of the Crysis 3 beta is invariably to stabilise the game ready for the final release ina  few weeks, 22nd February 2013.

Now that we have our hands on Crysis 3 we have put a whole bunch of PC hardware through its paces, to see how it runs on different systems.

First up for the Crysis 3 benchmarking test is the awesome Nvidia 8800 GTX.

Damn, the GTX 8800 is out before it even had a chance. The problem is that Nvidia 8800 GTX is only capable of DX 10 and yet the Crysis 3 Multiplayer beta requirements state that the GPU needs a DX 11 capable graphics solution.

Okay then, will the new onboard Intel HD 4000 gpu chipset be able to run Crysis 3?

Crysis 3 running on Intel I5-3570k Quad core @ 3.4GHz, 8 GB RAM, Onboard graphics Intel HD 4000.

Crysis 3 Frames Per Second at screen resolution 1366*768

Generally not very good, at low settings with SMAAx1 or below it is playable, especially for sniping or similar slow classes. At high speeds or in big fights, you may well slow down though.

Crysis 3 Frames Per Second at screen resolution 1024*768

Overall, quite playable, although would still keep AA at SMx2 or below. FXAA seemed to give a consistant 1-3 FPS boost over disabling, unsure why. With FXAA and Low settings, although the FPS is only 26, it is fairly constant, firefights/fast movement don't deteriorate it much. If you really want the graphics, you can go up to High with some loss of performance, although Very high is crippling. Similarly, avoid using the SMAAx4 or MSAAx8, they have a large drop in FPS. TxAA options are not available for this graphics solution.

So thats surprising. The HD 4000 onboard graphics solution can actually just about run Crysis 3 at lowest settings and with the system hungry AA turned off and the screen resolution set to tiny screen option. Of course the thought of playing Crysis 3 like this is likely to make a lot of people wince, but not everyone has a choice.

We noticed that Crysis 3's AA options varied depending on the GPU in the machine. With selections like TxAA High simply not being there for any but the most powerful cards.

Crysis 3 running on Intel I5-2500k Quad core @ 3.3GHz, 8 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 680 overclocked.

Lets bring in the big guns now to really put Crysis 3 through its graphical paces.


Crysis 3 Nvidia GTX 680 benchmarks are run at 1920 x 1080 screen resolution

The final column of the crysis 3 Nvidia GTX 680 graph displays the results where we have disabled the anti-aliasing altogether.

-------------------------

Whats the difference though? Why play Crysis 3 on one graphics setting over another? Why turn up Anti-aliasing?

Lets take a look. Here are some Crysis 3 screenshots with anti-aliasing turned off. The first screenshot is very high graphics setting. The second screenshot is with low graphics setting.

Now I reckon you are squinting to see any difference. Well, you can click the images to go to larger versions of the images but even still you will be hard pressed to notice any change. As is the way nowadays. A still screenshot is not the best way of seeing the subtle differences between all the graphical bells and whistles that modern games roll out anymore.

But bare in mind that these sorts of facts also translate into - Crysis 3 still looks good even in low settings and without Anti-aliasing turned on.

-------------------------

If you missed the other two sections to this Crysis 3 analysis then head over and take a look

Part two: Crysis 3 Nvidia GTX 560 Ti, AMD 6970 And 660 Ti SLI Benchmarks

Part three: Crysis 3 AMD HD 5770, Nvidia GTX 680 SLI AND GTX 660 TI Graphics Benchmarks

Crysis 3
Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion

Submit A Benchmark

Welcome. From this page you can submit a personal benchmark to GD. Once approved by GD admin everyone can search for your bench results here. The more results the more we all learn.

How To

Select a Tool in the form to the right, then select a Test. You will see a weblink appear beside your selection. Click this link to get the benchmark Tool. Try NovaBench for an all in one benchmark that is only 12Mb to download.

Run your choosen Benchmark Tool on your PC, using the benchmark tool's default setting. Take a screenshot displaying the benchmark score and information displaying your rig and submit that to us.

Full How-To Guide | Example Screenshot

Best - Recent and generally interesting topics at the top
Clear Discussion Notifications
1 2 3 4
0
Miha99
07:36 May-06-2014
Miha99's Rig
Saved at: Oct-23-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

I run multiplayer on high with 2xSSAA and still archieving 45+ fps all the time,exept on one map

0
aatire80
05:08 Jun-25-2013
aatire80's Rig
Saved at: Jul-17-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1680 x 1050
width x height

My God low looks so good as well…

0
Heihachi
19:20 Mar-04-2013
Heihachi's Rig
Saved at: Oct-17-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
6GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height

Pfff, i have to skip this game i think because i'am sure that i can't run this !

0
ShuRockY79
09:11 May-31-2013
ShuRockY79's Rig
Saved at: Oct-22-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1024 x 768
width x height

you can but at such low setting that it really isn't worth much
I played it at 30 fps all off
640x480 resolution :P
Still good looking graphics
and searched the net on how to make a DX10 card run it :)

0
SomeSayImBlack
09:14 Feb-22-2013
SomeSayImBlack's Rig
Saved at: Jul-12-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1280 x 1024
width x height

I'm probably onw of the only users that didnt want crysis 3 to be hardware demanding D: , this games runs at high on my CFX 6870s, please crytek have mercy

0
Clatso
16:29 Feb-16-2013
Clatso's Rig
Saved at: Sep-07-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

With the way I love Crysis games, I will kinda hate Crysis 3!!

0
CommandoRazor
20:56 Feb-19-2013
CommandoRazor's Rig
Saved at: Aug-12-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

butwhy?

0
chris11311
17:11 Feb-15-2013
chris11311's Rig
Saved at: May-29-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

Hey guys, you think it's worth to upgrade my sli gtx 660's to one gtx 690? Thanks

0
GamePro
18:38 Feb-15-2013
GamePro's Rig
Saved at: Jun-28-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

well…a 690 will need less power and will perform teoreticaly better than your 660's so i think it's worth the upgrade…

0
chris11311
20:15 Feb-15-2013
chris11311's Rig
Saved at: May-29-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1333MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

thanks.

0
IvGoatse
03:36 Feb-20-2013
IvGoatse's Rig
Saved at: Jun-29-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

Certainly worth it! Although you get better performance with 2 680's, I find running on less power while cooler wins over the slightly higher performance any day (:

0
fir3wulf
02:42 Feb-15-2013
fir3wulf's Rig
Saved at: Oct-25-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

The first thing i'm going to buy next month is a 660ti OC power edition
next up is a new mb and after that, i'm going for an i7. Will be the second intel based system I'm going to own, the last one was 11 years ago.

0
icefroZen
12:45 Feb-12-2013
icefroZen's Rig
Saved at: Oct-04-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
Phone

Well my GPU is pretty decent but … Just because i want to max the hell out this game i have to wait until i upgrade my cpu motherboard and ram :D

0
ffleader1
12:49 Feb-12-2013
ffleader1's Rig
Saved at: Mar-11-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1280 x 1024
width x height

I wish I had money to do so :D :D :D

0
sourodip
19:51 Feb-08-2013
sourodip's Rig
Saved at: Aug-31-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR2 800MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1600 x 900
width x height

how well will it perform on a radeon hd 7850 when fused with FX-8120,any fps assumptions?

0
Core2Quad
19:52 Feb-08-2013

Max settings with 40+fps :D

0
ffleader1
02:49 Feb-09-2013
ffleader1's Rig
Saved at: Mar-11-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1280 x 1024
width x height

If you are trying to upgrade your PC then it's not as easy as that. Due to your low DDRII RAM, you cannot set max setting and play this game well. Plus, due to fx-8120 is socket AM3+, and your mobo socket is AM3, you have to get a new mother board. And after you get a new mother board, you will have no get some brand new DDR III RAM and throw those DDR II of yours away. By the way, you MUST get a new PSU because there is no way your PSU now, the one that's feeding your CPU/GPU can handle the 7850…
In short, these are what you have to buy:
-A new AM3+ mobo
-A new 4GB RAM stick
-A new PSU
-A HD 7850
-A Fx-8120
There you go

0
debat0r
07:48 Feb-09-2013
debat0r's Rig
Saved at: Oct-24-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

am3 mobos often support fx cpus with a bios update, look at the site of the manufacturer :)

0
ffleader1
09:34 Feb-09-2013
ffleader1's Rig
Saved at: Mar-11-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1280 x 1024
width x height

For other mobos, I don't know but for ASUS M2N68-AM PLUS, no chance with fx. Their homepage said so, don't blame me :D :D :D :D :D:
http://www.asus.com/Motherboard/M2N68AM_PLUS/#support_CPU

0
debat0r
09:37 Feb-09-2013
debat0r's Rig
Saved at: Oct-24-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

I dunno, didn't look. But some am3 mobos support it, so "just sayin' " :)

0
Machlah
00:28 Feb-24-2013
Machlah's Rig
Saved at: Dec-07-2013
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

I tried running it with 8350 and 7850(only 1) i played on high preset with 50-120 fps

0
cjt08046
19:54 Feb-06-2013
cjt08046's Rig
Saved at: Oct-25-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
12GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

I did a search but didn't find anything on it: Does anyone know how exactly the multi-GPU anti-aliasing method works/what makes it different or better from the other methods? Thanks!

0
gregsuarez
19:58 Feb-06-2013

Google "txaa vs msaa vs fsaa"

0
Tero
08:58 Feb-07-2013

Here's something :)

0
cjt08046
15:36 Feb-07-2013
cjt08046's Rig
Saved at: Oct-25-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
12GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

Thanks Greg and Tero for the info!

0
cjt08046
15:47 Feb-07-2013
cjt08046's Rig
Saved at: Oct-25-2014
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
12GB DDR3 1066MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height

Thanks, Core2!

1 2 3 4
Author
Felix Nova

20,118

787

3,942
Avg likes per item
8