Ryzen R7 vs Skylake-X in Battlefield 1
Disclamer: The Ryzen benches are over a month old.
The setup(s): I7 7800X, MSI X299 Tomhawk, 2x8GB Corsair Vengance 3200 mhz, 1080Ti, AX1500I, Samsung 840 Pro, Windows 10
R7 1700, X370 Crosshair 6, 2x8GB Corsair Vengance 3200 mhz, 1080Ti, AX1500I, Samsung 840 Pro, Windows 10
I tested first Ryzen on the map in Battlefield called "Soissons". Later I tested the SK-X setup on some other maps. Someone said I needed to test the same map as performance may vary, and they were right..
The Ryzen setup was clocked at 3850 mhz which was the max 24/7 OC I could do.. The memory was set to 2933 as the Ryzen would not post with the default 3200. The GPU was at 2050/+500 mem.
The 7800X was clocked at 4700 which is not the max 24/7 OC. But a nice clockspeed considering powerdraw, voltage and temperatures. The memory was set at 3200 mhz. GPU was also at 2050/+500 on mem.
Both systems are identical expect the motherboard/CPU. Both systems were under custom water.
Results are on a 64 players conquest on the map called "Sessions" (Which is a lighter resource demanding map to play on IMHO..)
I7 7800X: Min FPS 114 - Max FPS 173 - Avg FPS 141 - 64 players Conquest on Soissons - Ultra preset - 1440P
R7 1700: MIN FPS 91 - Max FPS 174 - Avg FPS 115 - 64 players Conquest on Soissons - Ultra preset - 1440P
I've owned 3470 - 4670K - 4770K - 5820K - 5960X - 4790K - 6700K - 7700K - 1700 - 7800X.
I am open to answer any questions you might have. I sold the Ryzen system a few days ago. So can't do any more test on the Ryzen system.
I've recorded more benchmarks on BF1, and the results were similar all around. So no, this is not a one case scenario.
I've benchmarked every system the same way as the first.