Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
vs
8
5
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Xeon E3-1230 v2 Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 3% 130%
eFootball PES 2020 6% 123%
The Division 2 80% 325%
Doom Eternal 6% 123%
Metro: Exodus 55% 268%
Borderlands 3 3% 130%
Grand Theft Auto VI 55% 268%
Watch Dogs Legion 3% 130%
Total War: Three Kingdoms 55% 268%
FIFA 20 43% 36%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 is massively better than the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 was released over three years more recently than the Core 2 Quad, and so the Xeon E3-1230 v2 is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Core 2 Quad when running the latest games.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 and the Core 2 Quad both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 has 4 more threads than the Core 2 Quad. The Core 2 Quad has one thread per physical core, whereas the Xeon E3-1230 v2 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Core 2 Quad are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 0.9 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core 2 Quad has a 7168 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon E3-1230 v2, and although the Core 2 Quad does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 36 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core 2 Quad, and was created with a 43 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Xeon E3-1230 v2 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameIvy Bridge-H2Kentsfield
MoBo SocketLGA 1155/Socket H2LGA 775/ Socket T
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date14 May 201208 Jan 2007
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs4
CPU Threads8vs4
Clock Speed3.3 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency3.7 GHzvs-
System Bus -vs1066 MHz
Max TDP69 Wvs105 W
Lithography22 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature66°Cvs71°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs8192 KB
L3 Cache Size8 MBvs-
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewXeon E3-1230 v2 is a Server Processor based on the 22nm, Ivy Bridge architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.3GHz, which may go up to 3.7GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics and has a rated board TDP of 69W.

Though not created for gaming purposes, its performance is exceptionally good and enough for even the most demanding applications.
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz is a high-end Processor based on the 65nm Core micro-architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.4GHz and 8MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 105W.

It offers average performance. It will therefore become a bottleneck in today's demanding games.

Title

Body