Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Atom Z625 1.5GHz Core Solo T1400 1.83GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 3350% 1635%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 4545% 2236%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 3243% 1581%
FIFA 21 3127% 1523%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3808% 1865%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 5264% 2597%
Watch Dogs Legion 4545% 2236%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 3808% 1865%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5570% 2752%
Genshin Impact 2512% 1214%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core Solo T1400 1.83GHz is very slightly better than the Intel Atom Z625 1.5GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Atom Z625 1.5GHz was released over three years more recently than the Core Solo T1400, and so the Atom Z625 1.5GHz is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Core Solo T1400 when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Atom Z625 1.5GHz and the Core Solo T1400 both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Atom Z625 1.5GHz and the Core Solo T1400 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Atom Z625 1.5GHz and Core Solo T1400 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core Solo T1400 has a 0.33 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Atom Z625 1.5GHz has a 510 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core Solo T1400, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Atom Z625 1.5GHz wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Atom Z625 1.5GHz has a 25 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core Solo T1400, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Atom Z625 1.5GHz will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameLincroftYonah
MoBo SocketBGA 518Socket 479
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date04 Jan 201001 May 2006
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs1
Clock Speed1.5 GHzvs1.83 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus -vs667 MHz
Max TDP2 Wvs27 W
Lithography45 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width-vs32 Bit
Voltage Range-vs1.1625V - 1.30V KB
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size56 KBvs64 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs2 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsnono

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs35mm x 35mm
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel Atom is the brand name for a line of ultra-low-voltage IA-32 and x86-64 CPUs (or microprocessors) from Intel, originally designed in 45 nm CMOS with subsequent models, codenamed Cedar, using a 32 nm process. Atom is mainly used in netbooks, nettops, embedded applications ranging from health care to advanced robotics, and mobile internet devices (MIDs).Yonah was the code name for (the core of) Intel's first generation of 65 nm process mobile microprocessors, based on the Banias/Dothan-core Pentium M microarchitecture. SIMD performance has been improved through the addition of SSE3 instructions and improvements to SSE and SSE2 implementations, while integer performance decreased slightly due to higher latency cache. Additionally, Yonah includes support for the NX bit.