Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename Sandy Bridge SledgeHammer
MoBo Socket LGA 1155/Socket H2 Socket 939
Notebook CPU no no
Release Date 02 Sep 2012 01 Jun 2004
CPU Link GD Link GD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

{
CPU Cores 1 1
CPU Threads - 1
Clock Speed 1.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency - -
Max TDP 35 W 89 W
Lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Bit Width - 64 Bit
Max Temperature - 70°C
Virtualization Technology no no

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size 64 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache Size 256 KB 1024 KB
L2 Cache Speed - -
L3 Cache Size 1.5 MB -
Memory Types
ECC Memory Support no no

CPU Graphics

Integrated Graphics no no
Base GPU Frequency - -
Max GPU Frequency - -
DirectX - -
Displays Supported - -

CPU Mini Review

Mini Review Sandy Bridge is the codename for a microarchitecture developed by Intel beginning in 2005 for central processing units in computers to replace the Nehalem microarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under the Core brand. Athlon 64 FX-53 is an entry-level Processor based on the 130nm K8 micro-architecture. <br/> <br/> It offers 1 Physical Core (1 Logical), clocked at 2.4GHz and 1MB of L2 Cache. <br/> No relevant technologies are activated in a way the processor doesn't even support Virtualization. <br/> <br/> The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 89W. <br/> <br/> Its performance is below the average and so most demanding games will not run optimally.

Gaming Performance Comparison

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron G465 1.9GHz is marginally better than the AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Celeron G465 1.9GHz and the Athlon 64 FX-53 were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

{ The Celeron G465 1.9GHz and the Athlon 64 FX-53 both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, theCeleron G465 1.9GHz and the Athlon 64 FX-53 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron G465 1.9GHz and Athlon 64 FX-53 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon 64 FX-53 has a 0.5 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The <span class='gpu2Mention'>Athlon 64 FX-53</span> has a 768 KB bigger L2 cache than the <span class='gpu1Mention'>Celeron G465 1.9GHz</span>, and although the Athlon 64 FX-53 does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.