Select any two CPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron G540T 2.1GHz Athlon 5050e Dual Core
Cyberpunk 2077 413% 607%
Hitman 3 591% 852%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 591% 852%
Resident Evil 8 470% 686%
FIFA 21 380% 562%
Grand Theft Auto VI 744% 1063%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 397% 585%
Genshin Impact 289% 436%
The Medium 781% 1114%
Far Cry 6 710% 1016%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron G540T 2.1GHz is noticeably better than the AMD Athlon 5050e Dual Core when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz was released over three years more recently than the Athlon 5050e Dual, and so the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Athlon 5050e Dual when running the latest games.

The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz and the Athlon 5050e Dual both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz and the Athlon 5050e Dual may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz and Athlon 5050e Dual are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon 5050e Dual has a 0.5 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Athlon 5050e Dual has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz, and although the Athlon 5050e Dual does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz has a 10 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon 5050e Dual, and was created with a 33 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSandy BridgeBrisbane
MoBo SocketLGA 1155/Socket H2Socket AM2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date03 Jun 201221 Oct 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
Clock Speed2.1 GHzvs2.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP35 Wvs45 W
Lithography32 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs1024 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size2 MBvs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno

CPU Graphics

Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewCeleron G540T Dual-Core 2.1GHz is a budget CPU based on the 32nm Sandy Bridge micro-architecture with many of its features disabled, including Turbo Boost and Hyper Threading, that is optimized for low power consumption.
It offers 2 Cores, clocked at 2.1GHz and integrated graphics clocked at 650MHz (1.0GHz in Turbo Mode) and the memory controller supports DDR3-1066. It's expected to consume up to 35 Watt and offers 2MB of L3 Cache.
Expect average gaming performance which should be sufficient for most demanding games. However, this CPU will become a bottleneck for any of today's high-end GPUs.
On April 21, 2005, less than a week after the release of Venice and San Diego, AMD announced its next addition to the Athlon 64 line, the Athlon 64 X2. Released on May 31, 2005, it also initially had two different core revisions available to the public, Manchester and Toledo, the only appreciable difference between them being the amount of L2 cache. Both were released only for Socket 939. The Athlon 64 X2 was received very well by reviewers and the general public, with a general consensus emerging that AMD's implementation of multi-core was superior to that of the competing Pentium D. Some felt initially that the X2 would cause market confusion with regard to price points since the new processor was targeted at the same enthusiast, US$350 and above market already occupied by AMD's existing socket 939 Athlon 64s. AMD's official breakdown of the chips placed the Athlon X2 aimed at a segment they called the prosumer, along with digital media fans. The Athlon 64 was targeted at the mainstream consumer, and the Athlon FX at gamers.