Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Celeron G540T 2.1GHz | Core i7-880 Quad 3.06GHz |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 413% | 18% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 591% | 59% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 397% | 14% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 744% | 94% |
FIFA 21 | 380% | 10% |
Genshin Impact | 289% | 11% |
Far Cry 6 | 710% | 86% |
Hitman 3 | 591% | 59% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 591% | 59% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 698% | 84% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i7-880 Quad 3.06GHz is massively better than the Intel Celeron G540T 2.1GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz was released over a year more recently than the Core i7-880 Quad, and so the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.
The Core i7-880 Quad has 2 more cores than the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz. With 4 cores, the Core i7-880 Quad is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz and Core i7-880 Quad are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i7-880 Quad has a 0.96 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Core i7-880 Quad is superior.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Core i7-880 Quad has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz, which means that it, at worst, wins out in this area, and at best, will provide superior gaming performance and will work much better with high-end graphics cards.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Celeron G540T 2.1GHz has a 60 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i7-880 Quad, and was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron G540T 2.1GHz will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
CPU Codename | Sandy Bridge | Lynnfield | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | LGA 1155/Socket H2 | LGA 1156/Socket H | |||
Notebook CPU | no | no | |||
Release Date | 03 Jun 2012 | 30 May 2010 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 2 | vs | ![]() | 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU Threads | - | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz | vs | ![]() | 3.06 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | ![]() | 3.73 GHz | |
Max TDP | 35 W | ![]() | vs | 95 W | |
Lithography | 32 nm | ![]() | vs | 45 nm | |
Bit Width | - | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit | |
Max Temperature | - | vs | ![]() | 73°C | |
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 128 KB | vs | ![]() | 256 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 512 KB | vs | ![]() | 1024 KB | |
L2 Cache Speed | - | vs | - | ||
L3 Cache Size | 2 MB | vs | ![]() | 8 MB | |
Max Memory Size | - | vs | ![]() | 16 GB | |
Memory Channels | - | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
DirectX | - | vs | - | ||
Displays Supported | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Celeron G540T Dual-Core 2.1GHz is a budget CPU based on the 32nm Sandy Bridge micro-architecture with many of its features disabled, including Turbo Boost and Hyper Threading, that is optimized for low power consumption. It offers 2 Cores, clocked at 2.1GHz and integrated graphics clocked at 650MHz (1.0GHz in Turbo Mode) and the memory controller supports DDR3-1066. It's expected to consume up to 35 Watt and offers 2MB of L3 Cache. Expect average gaming performance which should be sufficient for most demanding games. However, this CPU will become a bottleneck for any of today's high-end GPUs. | Core i7-880 Quad 3.06GHz is a high-end CPU based on the 45nm, Nehalem architecture. It offers 4 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.06GHz, which may go up to 3.73GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated. The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics and has a rated board TDP of 95W. Its performance is very good and sufficient for any of today's games. |
---|