Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game APU E1-1500 Dual Core Core Solo T1400 1.83GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 1177% 1635%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1620% 2236%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1138% 1581%
Watch Dogs Legion 1620% 2236%
FIFA 21 1095% 1523%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1347% 1865%
Godfall 2367% 3251%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1999% 2752%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1886% 2597%
Genshin Impact 867% 1214%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD APU E1-1500 Dual Core is marginally better than the Intel Core Solo T1400 1.83GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The APU E1-1500 Dual was released over three years more recently than the Core Solo T1400, and so the APU E1-1500 Dual is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Core Solo T1400 when running the latest games.

The APU E1-1500 Dual has 1 more core than the Core Solo T1400. However, while the APU E1-1500 Dual will probably perform better than the Core Solo T1400, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The APU E1-1500 Dual and Core Solo T1400 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core Solo T1400 has a 0.35 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the APU E1-1500 Dual.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The APU E1-1500 Dual has a 1022 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core Solo T1400, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the APU E1-1500 Dual wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The APU E1-1500 Dual has a 9 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core Solo T1400, and was created with a 25 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the APU E1-1500 Dual will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameZacateYonah
MoBo SocketSocket FT1/413Socket 479
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date20 Mar 201201 May 2006
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs1
CPU Threads2vs-
Clock Speed1.48 GHzvs1.83 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus -vs667 MHz
Max TDP18 Wvs27 W
Lithography40 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs32 Bit
Voltage Range-vs1.1625V - 1.30V KB
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs64 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs2 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs35mm x 35mm
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAPU E1-1500 is a mobile processor based on the 40nm, Bobcat micro-architecture.
It includes two Bobcat cores at 1.48GHz and integrated Radeon HD 7310 Graphics, with 80 Shader Processing Units, clocked at 529MHz. The processor supports memory up to DDR3-1066 single channelled memory.
It only consumes up to 18 Watt but performs considerably worse when compared to Intel ULV Ivy Bridge processors.
Yonah was the code name for (the core of) Intel's first generation of 65 nm process mobile microprocessors, based on the Banias/Dothan-core Pentium M microarchitecture. SIMD performance has been improved through the addition of SSE3 instructions and improvements to SSE and SSE2 implementations, while integer performance decreased slightly due to higher latency cache. Additionally, Yonah includes support for the NX bit.