Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename Yonah Yonah
MoBo Socket Socket 479 Socket 479
Notebook CPU yes yes
Release Date 01 Jul 2006 23 Apr 2006
CPU Link GD Link GD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores 1 1
Clock Speed 1.2 GHz 1.06 GHz
Turbo Frequency - -
System Bus 533 MHz 533 MHz
Max TDP 6 W 6 W
Lithography 65 nm 65 nm
Bit Width 32 Bit 32 Bit
Voltage Range 0.85V-1.10V KB 0.85V - 1.1V KB
Virtualization Technology no yes

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size 64 KB 64 KB
L2 Cache Size 1024 KB 2 KB
L2 Cache Speed - -
L3 Cache Size - -
Memory Types
ECC Memory Support no no

CPU Graphics

Integrated Graphics no no

CPU Mini Review

Mini Review Merom is the code name for various Intel processors that are sold as Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Solo, Pentium Dual-Core and Celeron. It was the first mobile processor to be based on the Core microarchitecture, replacing the Enhanced Pentium M based Yonah processor. Merom has product code 80537, which is shared with Merom-2M and Merom-L that are very similar but have a smaller L2 cache. Merom-L has only one processor core and a different CPUID model. The desktop version of Merom is Conroe and the dual-socket server version is Woodcrest. Merom has subsequently been replaced by Penryn. Yonah was the code name for (the core of) Intel's first generation of 65 nm process mobile microprocessors, based on the Banias/Dothan-core Pentium M microarchitecture. SIMD performance has been improved through the addition of SSE3 instructions and improvements to SSE and SSE2 implementations, while integer performance decreased slightly due to higher latency cache. Additionally, Yonah includes support for the NX bit.

Gaming Performance Comparison

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron M ULV 443 1.2GHz is marginally better than the Intel Core Solo U1300 1.067GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Celeron M ULV 443 1.2GHz and the Core Solo U1300 1.067GHz were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

{ The Celeron M ULV and the Core Solo U1300 both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, theCeleron M ULV and the Core Solo U1300 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron M ULV and the Core Solo U1300 are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.14 GHz faster base clock rate, the Celeron M ULV manages to provide marginally better performance than the <span class='gpu2Mention'>Core Solo U1300</span>.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The <span class='gpu1Mention'>Celeron M ULV</span> has a 1022 KB bigger L2 cache than the <span class='gpu2Mention'>Core Solo U1300</span>, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the <span class='gpu1Mention'>Celeron M ULV</span> wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The System Bus Speed is important for providing higher bandwidth, and with higher bandwidth the system has the capacity to move more data over a certain time period than it would with lower bandwidth.

The Celeron M ULV and the Core Solo U1300 both have System Bus Speeds of 533 MHz, and so have the same limits when it comes to the size of the data being processed at once.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Celeron M ULV and the Core Solo U1300 have the same TDP of 6 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 65 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.