Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron M 450 2.0GHz Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 1683% 3459%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2301% 4692%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1628% 3349%
FIFA 21 1568% 3229%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1920% 3932%
Watch Dogs Legion 2301% 4692%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 2672% 5434%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2831% 5750%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 1920% 3932%
Genshin Impact 1250% 2595%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron M 450 2.0GHz is very slightly better than the Intel Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron M 450 was released over three years more recently than the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz, and so the Celeron M 450 is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Celeron M 450 and the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron M 450 and the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron M 450 and Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz has a 0.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron M 450 has a 768 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Celeron M 450 wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The System Bus Speed is important for providing higher bandwidth, and with higher bandwidth the system has the capacity to move more data over a certain time period than it would with lower bandwidth.

The Celeron M 450 has a 133 MHz faster System Bus Speed than the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz, and as such, has a marginally higher limit when it comes to the size of the data being processed at once.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron M 450 has a 8 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Celeron Mobile 2.2GHz, and was created with a 65 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron M 450 will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameYonahNorthwood
MoBo SocketSocket MSocket 478/Socket N
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date01 Oct 200616 Apr 2003
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs1
Clock Speed2 GHzvs2.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus 533 MHzvs400 MHz
Max TDP27 Wvs35 W
Lithography65 nmvs130 nm
Bit Width32 Bitvs32 Bit
Voltage Range1.0V-1.3V KBvs1.3V KB
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size64 KBvs8 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size35mm x 35mmvs31mm x 31mm
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Celeron is a family of microprocessors from Intel targeted at the low-end consumer market. CPUs in the Celeron brand have used designs from sixth- to eighth-generation CPU microarchitectures. [Please be aware that GD data is constantly refined as more information and reports are made available.]The Celeron brand has been used by Intel for several distinct ranges of x86 CPUs targeted at budget personal computers. Celeron processors can run all IA-32 computer programs, but their performance is somewhat lower when compared to similar CPUs with higher-priced Intel CPU brands. For example, the Celeron brand will often have less cache memory, or have advanced features purposely disabled. These missing features have had a variable impact on performance. In some cases, the effect was significant and in other cases the differences were relatively minor. Many of the Celeron designs have achieved a very high bang for the buck, while at other times, the performance difference has been noticeable. This has been the primary justification for the higher cost of other Intel CPU brands versus the Celeron range.