AMD Opteron 6282 SE
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
vs
8
8
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Opteron 6282 SE Xeon E3-1230 v2
Cyberpunk 2077 12% 3%
eFootball PES 2020 15% 6%
The Division 2 62% 80%
Metro: Exodus 40% 55%
Doom Eternal 15% 6%
Borderlands 3 12% 3%
Grand Theft Auto VI 40% 55%
Total War: Three Kingdoms 40% 55%
Watch Dogs Legion 12% 3%
FIFA 20 48% 43%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 6282 SE is significantly better than the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 was released less than a year after the Opteron 6282 SE, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores than the Xeon E3-1230 v2. 16 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the Xeon E3-1230 v2 is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Opteron 6282 SE, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 6282 SE and Xeon E3-1230 v2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 0.7 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Opteron 6282 SE.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 24 KB bigger L2 cache than the Opteron 6282 SE, but on the other hand, it is the Opteron 6282 SE that has a 16376 MB bigger L3 cache than the Xeon E3-1230 v2. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the Xeon E3-1230 v2 is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 71 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Opteron 6282 SE, and was created with a 10 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Xeon E3-1230 v2 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameInterlagosIvy Bridge-H2
MoBo SocketSocket G34LGA 1155/Socket H2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date14 Nov 201114 May 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores16vs4
CPU Threads-vs8
Clock Speed2.6 GHzvs3.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs3.7 GHz
System Bus 6400 MHzvs-
Max TDP140 Wvs69 W
Lithography32 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width-vs64 Bit
Max Temperature55°Cvs66°C
Virtualization Technologyyesvsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size48 KBvs256 KB
L1 Cache Count16vs-
L2 Cache Size1000 KBvs1024 KB
L2 Cache Count16vs-
L2 Cache Speed2600 MHzvs-
L3 Cache Size16384 MBvs8 MB
Max Memory Size-vs32 GB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOpteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.Xeon E3-1230 v2 is a Server Processor based on the 22nm, Ivy Bridge architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.3GHz, which may go up to 3.7GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics and has a rated board TDP of 69W.

Though not created for gaming purposes, its performance is exceptionally good and enough for even the most demanding applications.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementIntel Quick Sync Video
AMDBusiness ClassIntel InTru 3D
AMD Black EditionIntel Insider
Intel Wireless Display
Intel Flexible Display
Intel Clear Video HD
Intel vPro
Intel Hyper-Threading
Intel Virt. Tech. for Directed I/O
Intel Trusted Execution
AES New Instructions
Intel Anti-Theft
Idle States
Intel SpeedStep
Thermal Monitoring
Execute Disable Bit
Intel VT-x with EPT
Embedded Options

Title

Body