Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename Shanghai Clarkdale
MoBo Socket Socket Fr2 LGA 1156/Socket H
Notebook CPU no no
Release Date 29 Jan 2009 09 Jan 2011
CPU Link GD Link GD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

{
CPU Cores 4 2
CPU Threads - 2
Clock Speed 2.2 GHz 2.933 GHz
Turbo Frequency - -
System Bus 1000 MHz -
Max TDP 55 W 73 W
Lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Bit Width - 64 Bit
Voltage Range 1.2V KB 0.6500V-1.4000V KB
Max Temperature 55°C 72.6°C
Virtualization Technology yes yes

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size 128 KB 128 KB
L1 Cache Count 4 -
L2 Cache Size 512 KB 512 KB
L2 Cache Count 4 -
L2 Cache Speed 2200 MHz -
L3 Cache Size 6144 MB 3 MB
Memory Types DDR3-1066
Max Memory Size - 16 GB
Max Memory Bandwidth - 17 GB/s
Memory Channels - 2
ECC Memory Support no no

CPU Graphics

Integrated Graphics no no

CPU Mini Review

Mini Review Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively. - Note that these are also dual core, but under the Pentium brand. - Based on Westmere microarchitecture - All models support: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), Intel VT-x, Smart Cache.

Gaming Performance Comparison

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 8374 HE is significantly better than the Intel Pentium Dual Core G6960 2.93GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Opteron 8374 HE and the Pentium Dual Core G6960 2.93GHz were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

The 4 has 2 more cores than the Pentium Dual Core. { With 4 cores, the 4 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 8374 HE and Pentium Dual Core are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Pentium Dual Core has a 0.733 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the 4 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Opteron 8374 HE and the Pentium Dual Core have the same L2 cache size, but the <span class='gpu1Mention'>Opteron 8374 HE</span> has a 6141 MB bigger L3 cache, so in this area, it wins out over the <span class='gpu2Mention'>Pentium Dual Core</span>.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.