Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Opteron 8212 HE Athlon 64 2800+
Red Dead Redemption 2 1285% 1403%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 927% 1014%
Halo: Reach 472% 521%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 1429% 1560%
Borderlands 3 1285% 1403%
Cyberpunk 2077 1076% 1177%
FIFA 20 891% 976%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 661% 727%
eFootball PES 2020 1039% 1136%
Halo: The Master Chief Collection 1285% 1403%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 8212 HE is marginally better than the AMD Athlon 64 2800+ when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Opteron 8212 HE was released over a year more recently than the Athlon 64 2800+, and so the Opteron 8212 HE is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.

The Opteron 8212 HE has 1 more core than the Athlon 64 2800+. However, while the Opteron 8212 HE will probably perform better than the Athlon 64 2800+, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 8212 HE and Athlon 64 2800+ are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Opteron 8212 HE has a 0.4 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Opteron 8212 HE.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Opteron 8212 HE and the Athlon 64 2800+ have the same L2 cache size, and neither CPU appears to have an L3 cache. They even have the same L1 cache size, so are identical in terms of cache size.

The System Bus Speed is important for providing higher bandwidth, and with higher bandwidth the system has the capacity to move more data over a certain time period than it would with lower bandwidth.

The Opteron 8212 HE and the Athlon 64 2800+ both have System Bus Speeds of 1000 MHz, and so have the same limits when it comes to the size of the data being processed at once.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Opteron 8212 HE has a 21 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon 64 2800+, and was created with a 40 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Opteron 8212 HE will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSanta RosaClawHammer
MoBo SocketSocket FSocket 939
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date15 Aug 200619 Oct 2004
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs1
CPU Threads-vs1
Clock Speed2 GHzvs1.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus 1000 MHzvs1000 MHz
Max TDP68 Wvs89 W
Lithography90 nmvs130 nm
Bit Width-vs64 Bit
Voltage Range1.20 V/1.25 V KBvs-
Max Temperature55°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologyyesvsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L1 Cache Count2vs-
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs1024 KB
L2 Cache Count2vs-
L2 Cache Speed2000 MHzvs-
L3 Cache Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs1
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOpteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.Athlon 64 2800+ is an entry-level Processor based on the 130nm K8 micro-architecture.

It offers 1 Physical Core (1 Logical), clocked at 1.6GHz and 1MB of L2 Cache.
No relevant technologies are activated in a way the processor doesn't even support Virtualization.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 89W.

Its performance is quite poor considering today's standards. Therefore, its sufficient for office tasks only.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementAMD Power Management
AMDBusiness ClassAMD Business Class
AMD Black EditionAMD Black Edition

Title

Body