Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2 505% 284%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 348% 185%
Cyberpunk 2077 414% 226%
Borderlands 3 505% 284%
Need For Speed Heat 411% 225%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 233% 111%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 568% 324%
The Outer Worlds 558% 317%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 558% 317%
FIFA 20 333% 175%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz is significantly better than the Intel Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz was released less than a year after the Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz and Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz has a 0.9 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, we have to look back to the clock rate, where the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz wins out.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz has a 18 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz. However, the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz was created with a 10 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, but there really isn't much in it.

The Core i3-2375M 1.5GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz both have an on-board GPU, which means that they will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card.

For an in-depth GPU comparison, click on the GPU comparison icon that you can find throughout Game-Debate:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSandy BridgeIvy Bridge
MoBo SocketBGA 1023rPGA 988A / B / Socket G1 / G2
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date01 Mar 201224 Jun 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
Clock Speed1.5 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP17 Wvs35 W
Lithography32 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs512 KB
L3 Cache Size3 MBvs3 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 3000 MobileIntel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile
Base GPU Frequency350 MHzvs650 MHz
Max GPU Frequency-vs1350 MHz
DirectX10.1vs11
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewSandy Bridge is the codename for a microarchitecture developed by Intel beginning in 2005 for central processing units in computers to replace the Nehalem microarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under the Core brand.Ivy Bridge is the codename for Intel's 22 nm die shrink of the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture based on tri-gate ("3D") transistors. Ivy Bridge processors will be backwards-compatible with the Sandy Bridge platform, but might require a firmware update (vendor specific). Intel has released new 7-series Panther Point chipsets with integrated USB 3.0 to complement Ivy Bridge.Intel announced that volume production of Ivy Bridge chips began in the third quarter of 2011. Quad-core and dual-core-mobile models launched on April 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 respectively. Meanwhile, Core i3 desktop processors are said to arrive in the third quarter of 2012.

Title

Body