Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Sempron 3850 Athlon 5050e Dual Core
Cyberpunk 2077 383% 607%
Hitman 3 551% 852%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 551% 852%
Resident Evil 8 437% 686%
FIFA 21 352% 562%
Grand Theft Auto VI 694% 1063%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 368% 585%
Genshin Impact 266% 436%
The Medium 729% 1114%
Far Cry 6 663% 1016%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Sempron 3850 is noticeably better than the AMD Athlon 5050e Dual Core when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Sempron 3850 was released over three years more recently than the Athlon 5050e Dual, and so the Sempron 3850 is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Athlon 5050e Dual when running the latest games.

The Sempron 3850 has 2 more cores than the Athlon 5050e Dual. With 4 cores, the Sempron 3850 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Sempron 3850 and Athlon 5050e Dual are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon 5050e Dual has a 1.3 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Sempron 3850 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Sempron 3850 has a 1024 KB bigger L2 cache than the Athlon 5050e Dual, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Sempron 3850 wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Sempron 3850 has a 20 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon 5050e Dual, and was created with a 37 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Sempron 3850 will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The Sempron 3850 has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Athlon 5050e Dual, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon HD 8280, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameKabiniBrisbane
MoBo SocketSocket AM1Socket AM2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date09 Apr 201421 Oct 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs2
CPU Threads4vs-
Clock Speed1.3 GHzvs2.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP25 Wvs45 W
Lithography28 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature90°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs1024 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsRadeon HD 8280no
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewSempron 3850 is a low-budget quad-core processor based on the Jaguar microarchitecture.
Sempron 3850 packs 4 Kabini Cores, clocked at 1.45GHz and weak integrated graphics called Radeon HD 8280 that offer 128 Shader Processing Units and come clocked at 450MHz. The rated TDP is of 25W, thus the processor is suited for weaker systems.
The performance of the processor is below the average, while the integrated graphics can only run most modern games at the lowest settings.
On April 21, 2005, less than a week after the release of Venice and San Diego, AMD announced its next addition to the Athlon 64 line, the Athlon 64 X2. Released on May 31, 2005, it also initially had two different core revisions available to the public, Manchester and Toledo, the only appreciable difference between them being the amount of L2 cache. Both were released only for Socket 939. The Athlon 64 X2 was received very well by reviewers and the general public, with a general consensus emerging that AMD's implementation of multi-core was superior to that of the competing Pentium D. Some felt initially that the X2 would cause market confusion with regard to price points since the new processor was targeted at the same enthusiast, US$350 and above market already occupied by AMD's existing socket 939 Athlon 64s. AMD's official breakdown of the chips placed the Athlon X2 aimed at a segment they called the prosumer, along with digital media fans. The Athlon 64 was targeted at the mainstream consumer, and the Athlon FX at gamers.