Intel Celeron G3450 3.4GHz
vs
AMD FX-4300
vs
4
5
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron G3450 3.4GHz FX-4300

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-4300 is massively better than the Intel Celeron G3450 3.4GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron G3450 3.4GHz was released over a year more recently than the FX-4300, and so the Celeron G3450 3.4GHz is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.

The FX-4300 has 2 more cores than the Celeron G3450 3.4GHz. With 4 cores, the FX-4300 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

The FX-4300 has 2 more threads than the Celeron G3450 3.4GHz. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron G3450 3.4GHz and FX-4300 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the FX-4300 has a 0.4 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the FX-4300.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The FX-4300 has a 3584 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron G3450 3.4GHz, which means that it, at worst, wins out in this area, and at best, will provide superior gaming performance and will work much better with high-end graphics cards.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron G3450 3.4GHz has a 42 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the FX-4300, and was created with a 10 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron G3450 3.4GHz will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameHaswellVishera
MoBo SocketLGA 1150Socket AM3+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date14 May 201423 Oct 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs4
CPU Threads2vs4
Clock Speed3.4 GHzvs3.8 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs4 GHz
Max TDP53 Wvs95 W
Lithography22 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs192 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs4096 KB
L3 Cache Size3 MBvs4 MB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewUpcoming Haswell based budget processor.FX-4300 is a middle-class CPU based on the 32nm Piledriver architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 3.8GHz, which may go up to 4.0GHz and 4MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It offers average performance. It will therefore become a bottleneck in today's demanding games.

Title

Body