AMD APU A6-6420K Dual-Core
vs
AMD FX-6100
vs
3
6
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game APU A6-6420K Dual-Core FX-6100
Cyberpunk 2077 229% 66%
Grand Theft Auto VI 427% 165%
F1 2019 341% 122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 321% 112%
eFootball PES 2020 219% 61%
Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night 129% 16%
Borderlands 3 229% 66%
The Division 2 509% 207%
World War Z 379% 141%
Doom Eternal 219% 61%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-6100 is massively better than the AMD APU A6-6420K Dual-Core when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The APU A6-6420K Dual-Core was released over a year more recently than the FX-6100, and so the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.

The FX-6100 has 4 more cores than the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core. With 6 cores, the FX-6100 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

The FX-6100 has 4 more threads than the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The APU A6-6420K Dual-Core and FX-6100 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core has a 0.7 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the FX-6100 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The FX-6100 has a 5120 KB bigger L2 cache than the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core, and although the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The APU A6-6420K Dual-Core has a 30 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the FX-6100 (though they were created with the same size 32 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the APU A6-6420K Dual-Core will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The APU A6-6420K Dual-Core has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The FX-6100, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon HD 8470D, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameRichlandZambezi
MoBo SocketSocket FM2Socket AM3+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date01 Mar 201412 Oct 2011
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs6
CPU Threads2vs6
Clock Speed4 GHzvs3.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency4.2 GHzvs3.6 GHz
Max TDP65 Wvs95 W
Lithography32 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature70°Cvs70°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs288 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs6144 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs8 MB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsRadeon HD 8470D
Base GPU Frequency800 MHzvs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX11.1vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAPU A6-6420K Dual-Core is a performance CPU based on the 32nm, Piledriver architecture.

It offers 2 Physical Cores (2 Logical), initially clocked at 4.0GHz, which may go up to 4.2GHz and 1MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the processor has the clock multiplier unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor integrates weak Graphics called Radeon HD 8470D, with 192 Shader Processing Units, clocked at 800MHz, which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor.
Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 65W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.
FX-6100 is a high-end CPU based on the 32nm Bulldozer architecture.

It offers 6 Physical Cores (6 Logical), initially clocked at 3.3GHz, which may go up to 3.6GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It is a powerful Hexa Core whose performance is good. It's thus capable of running most applications smoothly without any problem.

Title

Body

No Ads

or, become Premium, be ad free + get access to all GD’s extra features

Here’s one for everyone. We remove ads for 24hrs if you visit the link below. You don’t need to buy anything there, just follow the link and be ad free.