Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz | Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 94% | 84% |
Hitman 3 | 161% | 147% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 161% | 147% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 88% | 78% |
FIFA 21 | 81% | 72% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 218% | 202% |
Far Cry 6 | 206% | 190% |
Genshin Impact | 47% | 39% |
Battlefield 6 | 171% | 157% |
Resident Evil 8 | 115% | 104% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz is very slightly better than the Intel Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz was released over a year more recently than the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz, and so the Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.
Both the Intel Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Intel Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz have the same number of threads. Both the Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz use hyperthreading. The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz has 2 logical threads per physical core and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz has 2.
Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz has a 1 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, we have to look back to the clock rate, where the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz wins out.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz has a 20 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz (though they were created with the same size 22 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
The Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz and the Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz both have an on-board GPU, which means that they will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card.
For an in-depth GPU comparison, click on the GPU comparison icon that you can find throughout Game-Debate:
On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.
CPU Codename | Haswell | Ivy Bridge | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | BGA 1168 | BGA 1023 | |||
Notebook CPU | yes | yes | |||
Release Date | 19 Jan 2014 | 03 Jun 2012 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU Threads | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz | vs | ![]() | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | 3 GHz | vs | ![]() | 3.1 GHz | |
Max TDP | 15 W | ![]() | vs | 35 W | |
Lithography | 22 nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 22 nm |
Bit Width | 64 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit |
Max Temperature | 100°C | vs | ![]() | 105°C | |
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 128 KB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 KB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 512 KB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 512 KB |
L2 Cache Speed | - | vs | - | ||
L3 Cache Size | 3 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 3 MB |
Max Memory Size | - | vs | ![]() | 32 GB | |
Max Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | ![]() | 25.6 GB/s | |
Memory Channels | - | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5000 Mobile | ![]() | Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | 200 MHz | vs | ![]() | 650 MHz | |
Max GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1350 MHz | |
DirectX | 11.1 | ![]() | vs | 11 | |
Displays Supported | - | vs | ![]() | 3 | |
Comparison |
Package Size | - | vs | 37.5 x 37.5mm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | ![]() | 3.0 | |
PCIe Revision | - | vs | ![]() | 3 | |
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | ![]() | 3 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Core i5-4360U 1.5GHz is a super energy efficient mobile processor based on the 22nm, Haswell architecture. It offers 2 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 1.5GHz, which may go up to 3.0GHz and 3MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated. The processor integrates powerful Graphics called Intel HD Graphics 5000, with 40 Execution Units, initially clocked at 200MHz and that go up to 1100MHz, in Turbo Mode which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor. Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 15W. It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications. | Core i5-3210M 2.5GHz is a middle-class mobile processor based on the 22nm, Ivy Bridge architecture. It offers 2 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 2.5GHz, which may go up to 3.1GHz and 3MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated and the processor has multiplier unlocked. The processor integrates mildly powerful Graphics called Intel HD Graphics 4000, with 16 Execution Units, initially clocked at 650MHz and that go up to 1100MHz, in Turbo Mode which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor. Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 35W. It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications. |
---|
Intel Quick Sync Video | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Quick Sync Video | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel InTru 3D | ![]() | ![]() | Intel InTru 3D | |||
Intel Insider | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Insider | |||
Intel Wireless Display | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Wireless Display | |||
Intel Flexible Display | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Flexible Display | |||
Intel Clear Video HD | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Clear Video HD | |||
Intel vPro | ![]() | ![]() | Intel vPro | |||
Intel Hyper-Threading | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Hyper-Threading | |||
Intel Virt. Tech. for Directed I/O | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Virt. Tech. for Directed I/O | |||
Intel Trusted Execution | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Trusted Execution | |||
AES New Instructions | ![]() | ![]() | AES New Instructions | |||
Intel Anti-Theft | ![]() | ![]() | Intel Anti-Theft | |||
Idle States | ![]() | ![]() | Idle States | |||
Intel SpeedStep | ![]() | ![]() | Intel SpeedStep | |||
Thermal Monitoring | ![]() | ![]() | Thermal Monitoring | |||
Execute Disable Bit | ![]() | ![]() | Execute Disable Bit | |||
Intel VT-x with EPT | ![]() | ![]() | Intel VT-x with EPT | |||
Embedded Options | ![]() | ![]() | Embedded Options |