Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Phenom II X4 B65 Opteron 4276 HE
Halo: Reach 22% 26%
Cyberpunk 2077 61% 53%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90% 80%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 43% 36%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41% 33%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 106% 95%
Doom Eternal 56% 48%
Grand Theft Auto VI 158% 144%
FIFA 20 36% 29%
Need For Speed Heat 60% 52%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 4276 HE is very slightly better than the AMD Phenom II X4 B65 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Opteron 4276 HE was released less than a year after the Phenom II X4, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Opteron 4276 HE has 4 more cores than the Phenom II X4. 8 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the Phenom II X4 is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Opteron 4276 HE, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Phenom II X4 and Opteron 4276 HE are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Phenom II X4 has a 0.8 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Opteron 4276 HE is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Phenom II X4 has a 1048 KB bigger L2 cache than the Opteron 4276 HE, but on the other hand, it is the Opteron 4276 HE that has a 2 MB bigger L3 cache than the Phenom II X4. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the Phenom II X4 is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Opteron 4276 HE has a 30 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Phenom II X4, and was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Opteron 4276 HE will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameDenebValencia
MoBo SocketSocket AM2+Socket C32
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date07 Dec 201004 Jun 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs8
CPU Threads4vs-
Clock Speed3.4 GHzvs2.6 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus -vs3200 MHz
Max TDP95 Wvs65 W
Lithography45 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature-vs68°C
Virtualization Technologynovsyes
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size512 KBvs48 KB
L1 Cache Count-vs8
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs1000 KB
L2 Cache Count-vs8
L2 Cache Speed-vs2600 MHz
L3 Cache Size6 MBvs8 MB
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewPhenom II X4 B65 is an unlocked Phenom II X2 565.

It should offer similar performance to a Phenom II X4 B99.
Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor to implement the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the 8- and 12-core Socket G34 Opterons, code-named Magny-Cours.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementAMD Power Management
AMDBusiness ClassAMD Business Class
AMD Black EditionAMD Black Edition

Title

Body