Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Phenom 8750 Triple-Core Black Edition Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 236% 314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 149% 207%
Halo: Reach 39% 71%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 271% 357%
FIFA 20 140% 196%
Borderlands 3 236% 314%
Cyberpunk 2077 185% 252%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 236% 314%
Halo: The Master Chief Collection 236% 314%
eFootball PES 2020 176% 240%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Phenom 8750 Triple-Core Black Edition is noticeably better than the AMD Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Athlon X2 7750 was released less than a year after the Phenom 8750 Triple-Core, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Phenom 8750 Triple-Core has 1 more core than the Athlon X2 7750. However, while the Phenom 8750 Triple-Core will probably perform better than the Athlon X2 7750, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. This should not affect games that are a few years old, and even the latest games should at least be playable on very low settings, as only recently have game developers begun to harness the power of multiple cores.

The Phenom 8750 Triple-Core has 1 more threads than the Athlon X2 7750. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Phenom 8750 Triple-Core and Athlon X2 7750 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon X2 7750 has a 0.3 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Phenom 8750 Triple-Core.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Athlon X2 7750 has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Phenom 8750 Triple-Core, and the two CPUs have the same L3 cache size, so the Athlon X2 7750 wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Phenom 8750 Triple-Core and the Athlon X2 7750 have the same TDP of 95 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 65 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameTolimanKuma
MoBo SocketSocket AM2+Socket FM2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date08 Sep 200814 Dec 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores3vs2
CPU Threads3vs2
Clock Speed2.4 GHzvs2.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP95 Wvs95 W
Lithography65 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature71°Cvs73°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs1024 KB
L3 Cache Size2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewPhenom 8750 Triple-Core Black Edition is a performance processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture.

It offers 3 Physical Cores (3 Logical), clocked at 2.4GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated and the processor has unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.
Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition is a middle-class processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture.

It offers 2 Physical Cores (2 Logical), clocked at 2.7GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.

Title

Body