Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition | Phenom 9700 Quad-Core |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 125% | 116% |
Hitman 3 | 203% | 191% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 203% | 191% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 118% | 109% |
FIFA 21 | 111% | 102% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 270% | 255% |
Far Cry 6 | 255% | 240% |
Genshin Impact | 71% | 63% |
Battlefield 6 | 215% | 202% |
Resident Evil 8 | 150% | 140% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Phenom 9700 Quad-Core is marginally better than the AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
Both the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition and the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.
Both the AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition and the AMD Phenom 9700 Quad-Core have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.
Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.1 GHz faster base clock rate, the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core manages to provide marginally better performance than the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, we have to look back to the clock rate, where the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core wins out.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
Both the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9700 Quad-Core have the same TDP of 125 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 65 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.
CPU Codename | Agena | Agena | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | Socket AM2+ | Socket AM2+ | |||
Notebook CPU | no | no | |||
Release Date | 27 Mar 2008 | 27 Mar 2008 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU Threads | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | ![]() | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max TDP | 125 W | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 125 W |
Lithography | 65 nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 65 nm |
Bit Width | 64 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit |
Max Temperature | 70°C | ![]() | vs | 61°C | |
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 512 KB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 512 KB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 2048 KB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 KB |
L3 Cache Size | 2 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 MB |
Memory Channels | - | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
DirectX | - | vs | - | ||
Displays Supported | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition is a performance processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture. It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.3GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features, Virtualization is activated and the processor has unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked easily. The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 125W. It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications. | Phenom 9700 Quad-Core is a performance processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture. It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.4GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features, Virtualization is activated. The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 125W. It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications. |
---|