Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game APU FX-7600P Quad-Core Core i7-660UM 2-Core 1.33GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 157% 244%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 246% 363%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 149% 233%
FIFA 21 141% 221%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 191% 289%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 300% 434%
Watch Dogs Legion 246% 363%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 191% 289%
Grand Theft Auto VI 323% 465%
Genshin Impact 95% 160%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD APU FX-7600P Quad-Core is significantly better than the Intel Core i7-660UM 2-Core 1.33GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core was released over three years more recently than the Core i7-660UM 2-Core, and so the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Core i7-660UM 2-Core when running the latest games.

The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core has 2 more cores than the Core i7-660UM 2-Core. With 4 cores, the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

Both the AMD APU FX-7600P Quad-Core and the Intel Core i7-660UM 2-Core 1.33GHz have the same number of threads. The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core has one thread per physical core, whereas the Core i7-660UM 2-Core uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core and Core i7-660UM 2-Core are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core has a 1.37 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core has a 3584 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core i7-660UM 2-Core, and although the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Core i7-660UM 2-Core has a 17 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core. However, the APU FX-7600P Quad-Core was created with a 4 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Core i7-660UM 2-Core is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, but there really isn't much in it.

The APU FX-7600P Quad-Core has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Core i7-660UM 2-Core, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon R7 7600P, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameKaveriArrandale
MoBo SocketBGA (FP3)BGA 1288
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date04 Jun 201424 May 2010
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs2
CPU Threads4vs4
Clock Speed2.7 GHzvs1.33 GHz
Turbo Frequency3.6 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Max TDP35 Wvs18 W
Lithography28 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature105°Cvs105°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size4096 KBvs512 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs4 MB
Max Memory Size-vs8 GB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsRadeon R7 7600P
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAPU FX-7600P Quad-Core is a middle-class mobile CPU based on the 28nm, Steamroller architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 2.7GHz, which may go up to 3.6GHz and 4MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated.

The processor integrates powerful Graphics called Radeon R7 7600P, with 512 Shader Processing Units, initially clocked at 600MHz (up to 686MHz in Turbo Mode), which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor.
Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 35W.

Benchmarks indicate its performance is just about as good as Intel's Core i5 Ultra-Low Voltage Processors.
Core i7-660UM 2-Core 1.33GHz is an ultra energy efficient mobile CPU based on the 32nm, Nehalem architecture.

It offers 2 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 1.33GHz, which may go up to 2.4GHz and 4MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, HyperThreading, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated.

The processor integrates very weak Graphics called Intel HD i7 660UM, with 10 Execution Units, initially clocked at 166MHz and that go up to 500MHz, in Turbo Mode which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor.
Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 18W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.