Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Athlon II X4 559 | Xeon Processor W3530 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 57% | 23% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 111% | 66% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 52% | 20% |
Hitman 3 | 111% | 66% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 158% | 103% |
FIFA 21 | 47% | 15% |
Far Cry 6 | 148% | 95% |
Genshin Impact | 19% | 7% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 144% | 92% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 111% | 66% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon Processor W3530 is massively better than the AMD Athlon II X4 559 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Athlon II X4 was released less than a year after the Xeon Processor W3530, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.
Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).
The Athlon II X4 and the Xeon Processor W3530 both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.
The Xeon Processor W3530 has 4 more threads than the Athlon II X4. The Athlon II X4 has one thread per physical core, whereas the Xeon Processor W3530 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.
Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Athlon II X4 and Xeon Processor W3530 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Athlon II X4 has a 0.6 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Athlon II X4 has a 1024 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon Processor W3530, but on the other hand, it is the Xeon Processor W3530 that has a 2 MB bigger L3 cache than the Athlon II X4. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the Athlon II X4 is likely superior in this area.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Xeon Processor W3530 has a 29 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon II X4 (though they were created with the same size 45 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Xeon Processor W3530 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
CPU Codename | Callisto | Nehalem-WS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | Socket AM2+ / AM3 | LGA 1366/Socket B | |||
Notebook CPU | no | no | |||
Release Date | 01 Jan 2011 | 16 Mar 2010 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU Threads | 4 | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz | ![]() | vs | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | ![]() | 3.06 GHz | |
Max TDP | 159 W | vs | ![]() | 130 W | |
Lithography | 45 nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 45 nm |
Bit Width | - | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit | |
Max Temperature | - | vs | ![]() | 69.7°C | |
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 512 KB | ![]() | vs | 256 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 2048 KB | ![]() | vs | 1024 KB | |
L3 Cache Size | 6 MB | vs | ![]() | 8 MB | |
Memory Channels | - | ![]() | vs | - | |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
DirectX | - | vs | - | ||
Displays Supported | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | This is the unlocked version of the Phenom II X2 B59. | The Xeon is a brand of multiprocessing- or multi-socket-capable x86 microprocessors from Intel Corporation targeted at the non-consumer workstation, server, and embedded system markets. |
---|