Intel Xeon Processor W3690
vs
AMD FX-6350
vs
8
7
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Xeon Processor W3690 FX-6350

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon Processor W3690 is massively better than the AMD FX-6350 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The FX-6350 was released less than a year after the Xeon Processor W3690, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Xeon Processor W3690 and the FX-6350 both have 6 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

The Xeon Processor W3690 has 6 more threads than the FX-6350. The FX-6350 has one thread per physical core, whereas the Xeon Processor W3690 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Xeon Processor W3690 and FX-6350 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the FX-6350 has a 0.44 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The FX-6350 has a 4608 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon Processor W3690, but on the other hand, it is the Xeon Processor W3690 that has a 4 MB bigger L3 cache than the FX-6350. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the FX-6350 is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The FX-6350 has a 5 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Xeon Processor W3690 (though they were created with the same size 32 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the FX-6350 will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameWestmere-EPVishera
MoBo SocketLGA 1366/Socket BSocket AM3+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date30 Nov -000101 Oct 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores6vs6
CPU Threads12vs6
Clock Speed3.46 GHzvs3.9 GHz
Turbo Frequency3.73 GHzvs4.2 GHz
Max TDP130 Wvs125 W
Lithography32 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature68°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs288 KB
L2 Cache Size1536 KBvs6144 KB
L3 Cache Size12 MBvs8 MB
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel Xeon W3690 is currently, the fastest processor available for Socket LGA 1366/Socket B. It has 6 cores and 12 threads which normally operate in the frequency of 3.46 GHz which can potentially go up to 3.73 GHz under load. It has a 12 MB L3 cache. It is a high performance capable of running most games on max settings but it was designed for server and workstation use.FX-6350 is a high-end CPU based on the 32nm Bulldozer architecture.

It offers 6 Physical Cores (6 Logical), initially clocked at 3.9GHz, which may go up to 4.2GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 125W.

It is a powerful Hexa Core whose performance is good. It's thus capable of running most applications smoothly without any problem.

Title

Body