AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Opteron 6380
vs
10
9
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Ryzen 7 2700X Opteron 6380
Battlefield V 8% 36%
Assassins Creed: Odyssey 48% 23%
Fallout 76 36% 6%
PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds 42% 14%
Desperados 3 48% 23%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27% 7%
Hitman 2 (2018) 34% 3%
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 53% 30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36% 6%
FIFA 19 68% 53%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is massively better than the AMD Opteron 6380 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Ryzen 7 2700X was released over three years more recently than the Opteron 6380, and so the Ryzen 7 2700X is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Opteron 6380 when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Opteron 6380 has 8 more cores than the Ryzen 7 2700X. 16 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the Ryzen 7 2700X is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Opteron 6380, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Ryzen 7 2700X and Opteron 6380 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Ryzen 7 2700X has a 1.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Opteron 6380 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Ryzen 7 2700X has a 3096 KB bigger L2 cache than the Opteron 6380, but on the other hand, it is the Opteron 6380 that has a 16368 MB bigger L3 cache than the Ryzen 7 2700X. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the Ryzen 7 2700X is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Ryzen 7 2700X has a 20 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Opteron 6380, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Ryzen 7 2700X will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

Can I Run It

Check any game system requirements

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameZen+Abu Dhabi
MoBo SocketSocket AM4Socket G34
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date30 Apr 201805 Nov 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores8vs16
CPU Threads16vs-
Clock Speed3.7 GHzvs2.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency4.3 GHzvs-
System Bus -vs6400 MHz
Max TDP95 Wvs115 W
Lithography12 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature-vs69°C
Virtualization Technologynovsyes
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size512 KBvs48 KB
L1 Cache Count-vs16
L2 Cache Size4096 KBvs1000 KB
L2 Cache Count-vs16
L2 Cache Speed-vs2500 MHz
L3 Cache Size16 MBvs16384 MB
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8-Core 3.7GHz is a high-end CPU based on the 12nm Zen+ microarchitecture. It offers 8 physical cores (16 threads), initially clocked at 3.7GHz base clock and 4.3GHz boost with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and 16MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features are Simultaneous Multithreading, Cool n Quiet, CoolCore Technology, Extended Frequency Range (XFX) 2.0, Pure Power and Precision Boost 2.0. This CPU is likely to offer exceptional computational performance and will not be the bottleneck in any modern gaming PC. It will be able to play all modern games comfortably on high/ultra graphics performance without being a hindrance to the accompanying GPU.Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementAMD Power Management
AMDBusiness ClassAMD Business Class
AMD Black EditionAMD Black Edition