9.9
Check Prices $299
6.2
Check Prices $224
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Ryzen 7 2700 8-Core 3.2GHz Core i5-4670 3.4GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2 31% 18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49% 13%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 31% 18%
Cyberpunk 2077 41% 0%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 25% 28%
Borderlands 3 31% 18%
FIFA 20 50% 16%
The Outer Worlds 39% 3%
eFootball PES 2020 43% 3%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 24% 30%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-Core 3.2GHz is massively better than the Intel Core i5-4670 3.4GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Ryzen 7 2700 was released over three years more recently than the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz, and so the Ryzen 7 2700 is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Ryzen 7 2700 has 4 more cores than the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz. 8 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Ryzen 7 2700, it would seem to be a decent choice.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has 12 more threads than the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz. The Core i5-4670 3.4GHz has one thread per physical core, whereas the Ryzen 7 2700 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i5-4670 3.4GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz has a 0.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 2048 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz, which means that it, at worst, wins out in this area, and at best, will provide superior gaming performance and will work much better with high-end graphics cards.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 19 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i5-4670 3.4GHz, and was created with a 10 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Ryzen 7 2700 will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The Core i5-4670 3.4GHz has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Ryzen 7 2700, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Intel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenamePinnacle RidgeHaswell
MoBo SocketSocket AM4LGA 1150
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date19 Apr 201804 Jun 2013
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores8vs4
CPU Threads16vs4
Clock Speed3.2 GHzvs3.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency4.1 GHzvs3.8 GHz
Max TDP65 Wvs84 W
Lithography12 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width54 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature-vs73°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size-vs256 KB
L2 Cache Size3072 KBvs1024 KB
L3 Cache Size16 MBvs6 MB
Max Memory Size-vs32 GB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4600 Desktop
Base GPU Frequency-vs400 MHz
Max GPU Frequency-vs1250 MHz
DirectX-vs11.1
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Ryzen 7 2700 8-Core 3.2GHz is a high-range CPU based on AMD's 12nm Zen+ microarchitecture. It offers 8 physical cores (16 logical), initially clocked at 3.2GHz, which may go up to 4.1GHz using Turbo Boost. It has an unlocked multiplier, therefore, it can be overclocked using traditional methods. It has 16MB of L3 Cache. Level 3 cache is a static memory bank of a processor and it is used to feed it instructions. It has 3MB of L2 cache, 512KB per core. This processor also supports DDR4 based RAMs with maximum memory support of 64GB. It has a maximum Thermal Power Design of 65W. It is on par with competitor processors. Among its many features, Simultaneous Multithreading, Cool n Quiet, CoolCore Technology, Extended Frequency Range (XFX), Pure Power and Precision Boost are enabled. This CPU is likely to offer excellent computational performance and will not be the bottleneck in any modern gaming PC.Core i5-4670 3.4GHz is a performance CPU based on the 22nm, Haswell architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), initially clocked at 3.4GHz, which may go up to 3.8GHz and 6MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Boost and Virtualization are activated.

The processor integrates powerful Graphics called Intel HD Graphics 4600, with 20 Execution Units, initially clocked at 350MHz and that go up to 1200MHz, in Turbo Mode which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor.
Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 84W.

Compared to Core i5-3570K there's an overall 6% performance boost. Its performance is exceptionally good and enough for even the most demanding applications.

Title

Body

Ads

or, become Premium, be ad free + get access to all GD’s extra features

Here’s one for everyone. We remove ads for 24hrs if you visit the link below. You don’t need to buy anything there, just follow the link and be ad free.