Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2 550% 284%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 382% 185%
Cyberpunk 2077 452% 226%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 257% 111%
Need For Speed Heat 449% 225%
The Outer Worlds 606% 317%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 606% 317%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 550% 284%
Borderlands 3 550% 284%
FIFA 20 365% 175%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz is massively better than the Intel Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz was released over a year more recently than the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz, and so the Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz and Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz has a 0.7 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz have the same L2 cache size, but the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz has a 1 MB bigger L3 cache, so in this area, it wins out over the Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz has a 20 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz, and was created with a 8 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz and the Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz both have an on-board GPU, which means that they will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card.

For an in-depth GPU comparison, click on the GPU comparison icon that you can find throughout Game-Debate:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameBroadwellIvy Bridge
MoBo SocketBGA 1168rPGA 988A / B / Socket G1 / G2
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date30 Mar 201524 Jun 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
CPU Threads2vs-
Clock Speed1.7 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP15 Wvs35 W
Lithography14 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature105°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs512 KB
L3 Cache Size2 MBvs3 MB
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell)Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile
Base GPU Frequency-vs650 MHz
Max GPU Frequency-vs1350 MHz
DirectX-vs11
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size82vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Intel Celeron 3215U 1.7GHz is a budget, low-performance mobile processor based on the 14nm Broadwell microarchitecture. In released during the second quarter of 2015. It comes packing 2 physical cores (2 threads) clocked at 1.50GHz. It does not utilize Intel's HyperThreading technology and does not have a Turbo clock frequency. It's L1, L2 and L3 cache are of 128 KB, 512 KB and 2 MB respectively. It integrates the weak Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) clocked at 300MHz base clock and 850MHz boost clock, and has a TDP of 15W.Ivy Bridge is the codename for Intel's 22 nm die shrink of the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture based on tri-gate ("3D") transistors. Ivy Bridge processors will be backwards-compatible with the Sandy Bridge platform, but might require a firmware update (vendor specific). Intel has released new 7-series Panther Point chipsets with integrated USB 3.0 to complement Ivy Bridge.Intel announced that volume production of Ivy Bridge chips began in the third quarter of 2011. Quad-core and dual-core-mobile models launched on April 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 respectively. Meanwhile, Core i3 desktop processors are said to arrive in the third quarter of 2012.

Title

Body