97
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
0.00
100
Check Prices $6841
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename - Ivy Bridge
MoBo Socket LGA 1200 LGA 2011/Socket R
Notebook CPU no no
Release Date 04 Feb 2020 18 Feb 2014
CPU Link GD Link GD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

{
CPU Cores 10 15
CPU Threads 20 30
Clock Speed 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo Frequency 4.7GHz 3.4 GHz
Max TDP 65 W 155 W
Lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Bit Width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Max Temperature 100°C 77°C
Virtualization Technology no no

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size - 960 KB
L2 Cache Size - 3840 KB
L3 Cache Size 20 MB 37.5 MB
Memory Types
Max Memory Size 128 GB -
Memory Channels 2 -
ECC Memory Support no no

CPU Graphics

Integrated Graphics no no
Base GPU Frequency - -
Max GPU Frequency - -
DirectX - -
Displays Supported - -

CPU Mini Review

Mini Review The Core i9-10900E 10-Core 2.80GHz is a CPU based on a refinement of the 14nm++ Comet Lake-S microarchitecture. It offers 10 physical cores (20 logical), initially clocked at 2.80 GHz, which may go up to 4.70 GHz using 10 cores with Turbo Boost. The Core i9-10900E has 20MB of L3 Cache. Xeon E7-8890 v2 is a server processor based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. It offers 15 Ivy Bridge-EX Cores (30 logical, clocked at 2.8GHz that go up to 3.4GHz, in Turbo Mode. It also offers over 37MB of L3 Cache and may consume up to 155 Watts. Its performance, just like its price, is outstanding and though not meant for gaming, the processor easily beats any Core i7 processor.

Gaming Performance Comparison

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 is massively better than the Intel Core i9-10900E 10-Core 2.80GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Core i9-10900E 10-Core 2.80GHz and the Xeon E7-8890 v2 were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The 15 has 5 more cores than the Core i9-10900E 10-Core. 15 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The 10 cores in the Core i9-10900E 10-Core is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the 15, it would seem to be a decent choice.

The Xeon E7-8890 v2 has 10 more threads than the Core i9-10900E 10-Core. Both the Core i9-10900E 10-Core and the Xeon E7-8890 v2 use hyperthreading. The Core i9-10900E 10-Core has 2 logical threads per physical core and the Xeon E7-8890 v2 has 2.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Core i9-10900E 10-Core and Xeon E7-8890 v2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i9-10900E 10-Core and the Xeon E7-8890 v2 both have the same clock frequency, this is by no means an indicator that the two CPUs will provide the same level of performance. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.