Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename Sparta Orleans
MoBo Socket Socket AM2 Socket AM2
Notebook CPU no no
Release Date 08 Oct 2007 08 Oct 2007
CPU Link GD Link GD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores 1 1
Clock Speed 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency - -
Max TDP 45 W 45 W
Lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Bit Width - -
Virtualization Technology no no

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size 128 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache Size 512 KB 1024 KB
L3 Cache Size - -
Memory Types
ECC Memory Support no no

CPU Graphics

Integrated Graphics no no

CPU Mini Review

Mini Review Sempron has been the marketing name used by AMD for several different budget desktop CPUs, using several different technologies and CPU socket formats. The Sempron replaced the AMD Duron processor and competes against Intel's Celeron series of processors. AMD coined the name from the Latin semper, which means always, to suggest the Sempron is suitable for daily use, practical, and part of everyday life. The Athlon made its debut on June 23, 1999. Athlon is the ancient Greek word for Champion/trophy of the games. <br />Athlon is the brand name applied to a series of x86-compatible microprocessors designed and manufactured by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). The original Athlon (now called Athlon Classic) was the first seventh-generation x86 processor and retained the initial performance lead it had over Intel's competing processors for a significant period of time. The original Athlon also had the distinction of being the first desktop processor to reach speeds of one gigahertz (GHz). AMD has continued using the Athlon name with the Athlon 64, an eighth-generation processor featuring x86-64 (later renamed AMD64) architecture, and the Athlon II.

Gaming Performance Comparison

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Sempron 64 LE-1250 is marginally better than the AMD Athlon LE-1600 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Sempron 64 LE-1250 and the Athlon LE-1600 were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

{ The Sempron 64 LE-1250 and the Athlon LE-1600 both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, theSempron 64 LE-1250 and the Athlon LE-1600 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Sempron 64 LE-1250 and Athlon LE-1600 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Sempron 64 LE-1250 and the Athlon LE-1600 both have the same clock frequency, this is by no means an indicator that the two CPUs will provide the same level of performance. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The <span class='gpu2Mention'>Athlon LE-1600</span> has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the <span class='gpu1Mention'>Sempron 64 LE-1250</span>, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the <span class='gpu2Mention'>Athlon LE-1600</span> wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Sempron 64 LE-1250 and the Athlon LE-1600 have the same TDP of 45 Watts, but the Sempron 64 LE-1250 has a lower lithography size, and so will affect your yearly electricity bills less adversely.