Jagged Alliance: Back in Action System Requirements

12th August 2021 - Specs reviewed

Minimum Requirements

  • OS: Windows XP 32-bit
  • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon X1800 Series 256MB or NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
  • RAM: 2 GB
  • HDD: 3 GB
  • DirectX 9 Compatible Graphics Card
 

Recommended Requirements

  • OS: Windows XP 32-bit
  • Processor: Intel Core i5-680 3.6GHz / AMD Phenom II X4 905e
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 5830 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
  • RAM: 4 GB
  • HDD: 3 GB
  • DirectX 9 Compatible Graphics Card
PC System Analysis For Jagged Alliance: Back in Action Requirements
You need a Core i5-680 3.6GHz or Phenom II X4 905e processor coupled with a GeForce GTX 460 SE to run Jagged Alliance: Back in Action system requirements at recommended. You can expect to get around 60FPS at 1080p screen res on high graphics settings with this hardware. System memory for min is 2 GB. Make sure your GPU can run DirectX 9.00 or Jagged Alliance: Back in Action won’t run. To summarise, Jagged Alliance: Back in Action needs around a 11 year old PC to play at recommended settings.
FPS System Benchmark
200+ FPS
High
Graphics Card
0
How well optimised is Jagged Alliance: Back in Action for PC? 10
10
Where does Jagged Alliance: Back in Action rank in the list of the most demanding games?
Genres: Strategy , RPG , Management
Can I run Jagged Alliance: Back in Action
Please select a processor
Please select a graphics solution

Jagged Alliance: Back in Action System Requirements

Minimum
Recommended
Processor
Graphics Card
VRAM
RAM
2 GB
4 GB
OS
Windows XP 32-bit
Windows XP 32-bit
DirectX
9
9
HDD Space
3 GB
3 GB

Jagged Alliance: Back in Action PC Release Date:

9 Feb 2012

Alternative Game Tags: mercenary squad, 4x, Jagged alliance 3, ja back in action, jaggedalliance back in action, jagged alliance BIA, jabia

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
646
Offline
admin approved badge
16:48 May-25-2012

It will be better that this game used other title, because this game used Jagged Alliance title, the JA veterans who try this game will compare it with previous title, i know the developer want to make this game popular because it use Jagged Alliance title, but like i said, if the veterans didn't accept this game as a sequel, or remake instead keep complementing the previous series a new gamer who has not yet play this game will try to play the previous one and they will compare it with the previous one, making it even not popular as JA's sequel

0
Rep
0
Offline
14:00 Apr-18-2012

Can i run this?
CHECK MY RIG

0
Rep
130
Offline
admin approved badge
17:00 May-25-2012

I doubt it :( maybe on low.. :)

0
Rep
646
Offline
admin approved badge
17:07 May-25-2012

at least playable..

0
Rep
824
Offline
admin approved badge
03:53 May-26-2012

I have this game and its not hardware dependent, especially at your resolution you will not have any problems running this game, its bird view so you will not have trouble with your fps either :)

0
Rep
52
Offline
12:29 Mar-11-2012

i prefer waiting a silent storm sequel to jagged alliance

0
Rep
2,003
Offline
admin approved badge
12:34 Mar-11-2012

That would be awesome! Loved the first one, Sentinels didn't do it for me... :)

0
Rep
52
Offline
12:43 Mar-11-2012

i hate it when shooting a panzerklein, bullets bounces when i shooting them, so im using a BFG!

0
Rep
2,003
Offline
admin approved badge
12:46 Mar-11-2012

I modded the PKs out of the game :D

0
Rep
52
Offline
12:49 Mar-11-2012

wow, i would like to know where i can download the mods, if you know

0
Rep
2,003
Offline
admin approved badge
14:00 Mar-11-2012
0
Rep
52
Offline
00:57 Mar-13-2012

wow, plenty of mods there, thanks :D

0
Rep
2,003
Offline
admin approved badge
08:01 Mar-13-2012

No problem :)

0
Rep
-4
Offline
09:50 Feb-16-2012

This game sucks

0
Rep
0
Offline
11:37 Feb-15-2012

loved the old jagged alliance games and i like this too only problem is it looks very similar to them also

0
Rep
34
Offline
10:05 Feb-11-2012

Game are good and not complaining!:=)

0
Rep
122
Offline
00:05 Jan-26-2012

Dont know, even if the graphics were good i dont get the gameplay... Doesnt hold my attention :/

0
Rep
1,471
Offline
admin approved badge
22:28 Jan-25-2012

But even Silent Storm has better visuals than this and it's from 2004 if I recall.

0
Rep
1,471
Offline
admin approved badge
22:28 Jan-25-2012

ahahahahah don't exaggerate lol

0
Rep
122
Offline
22:27 Jan-25-2012

From the trailer i can conclude it looks like komando from 97 rofl :D

0
Rep
1,471
Offline
admin approved badge
21:26 Jan-25-2012

Anyone else thinks the visual are good for 2006 and awful for 2012?!

0