Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Rage 128 Pro GeForce 6150 SE 256MB
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 22057%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 20165%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 19508%
FIFA 21 14150% 11076%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 31076%
Far Cry 6 40775% 31959%
Genshin Impact 28150% 22057%
Hitman 3 36650% 28724%
Watch Dogs Legion 27150% 21273%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 40400% 31665%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6150 SE 256MB are noticeably better than the AMD Rage 128 Pro.

The 6150 SE was released over three years more recently than the Rage 128 Pro, and so the 6150 SE is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Rage 128 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 6150 SE has 224 MB more video memory than the Rage 128 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The Rage 128 Pro has 2.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 6150 SE, which means that the memory performance of the Rage 128 Pro is marginally better than the 6150 SE.

Both the Rage 128 Pro and the GeForce 6150 SE 256MB have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the 6150 SE is 1 and by the Rage 128 Pro is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the 6150 SE is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed125 MHzvs425 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-MCP61
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 1999vs01 Jun 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed143 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth2.3GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewLater, ATI developed a successor to the original Rage 128, called the Rage 128 Pro. This chip carried several enhancements, including an enhanced triangle setup engine that doubled geometry throughput to eight million triangles/s, better texture filtering, DirectX 6.0 texture compression, AGP 4, DVI support, and a Rage Theater chip for composite and S-Video TV-in. This chip was used on the gamer-oriented Rage Fury Pro boards and the business-oriented Xpert 2000 PRO.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500, 6200, 6150 and 6100 GPUs feature a revolutionary design that delivers best-in-class performance on today's hottest games and applications. The only GPUs in their class to support Microsoft DirectX 9.0 Shader Model 3.0, these GPUs power the latest effects without compromising performance. Further, these GPUs include NVIDIA PureVideo to deliver crisp, vibrant video to the PC.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-