Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Rage 128 Pro GeForce 7050
Hitman 3 36650% 26627%
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 20445%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 18691%
Resident Evil 8 28150% 20445%
FIFA 21 14150% 10264%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 28809%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 18082%
Genshin Impact 28150% 20445%
Far Cry 6 40775% 29627%
The Medium 35150% 25536%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 7050 are significantly better than the AMD Rage 128 Pro.

The GeForce 7050 was released over three years more recently than the Rage 128 Pro, and so the GeForce 7050 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Rage 128 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 7050 has 96 MB more video memory than the Rage 128 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 7050 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 7050 has 3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Rage 128 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 7050 is marginally better than the Rage 128 Pro.

Both the Rage 128 Pro and the GeForce 7050 have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 7050 is 1 and by the Rage 128 Pro is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 7050 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed125 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-MCP76
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 1999vs01 Sep 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed143 MHzvs334 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth2.3GB/secvs5.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs9.0
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewLater, ATI developed a successor to the original Rage 128, called the Rage 128 Pro. This chip carried several enhancements, including an enhanced triangle setup engine that doubled geometry throughput to eight million triangles/s, better texture filtering, DirectX 6.0 texture compression, AGP 4×, DVI support, and a Rage Theater chip for composite and S-Video TV-in. This chip was used on the gamer-oriented Rage Fury Pro boards and the business-oriented Xpert 2000 PRO.The GeForce experience is more affordable than ever with NVIDIA GeForce 7 Series motherboard GPUs, now for Intel-based PCs. *Immersive experiences on the latest applications and games. *Enjoy Windows Aero features such as Flip 3D, taskbar preview and translucent windows for a more productive computing experience. *Support for a full range of Intel CPUs (including Core™ 2, Pentium™ and Celeron™ CPU families), DDR2-800 memory and integrated HDMI or DVI display output.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-