Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Rage 128 Pro GeForce 4 MX 440
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 9726%
Hitman 3 36650% 12683%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 8887%
Resident Evil 8 28150% 9726%
FIFA 21 14150% 4857%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 13726%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 8596%
The Medium 35150% 12161%
Genshin Impact 28150% 9726%
Far Cry 6 40775% 14117%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 4 MX 440 are massively better than the AMD Rage 128 Pro.

The 4 MX was released over a year more recently than the Rage 128 Pro, and so the 4 MX is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Rage 128 Pro.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 4 MX has 96 MB more video memory than the Rage 128 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the 4 MX also has superior memory performance overall.

The 4 MX has 0.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Rage 128 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the 4 MX is marginally better than the Rage 128 Pro.

Both the Rage 128 Pro and the GeForce 4 MX 440 have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the 4 MX is 1 and by the Rage 128 Pro is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the 4 MX is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed125 MHzvs275 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV17
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 1999vs06 Feb 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed143 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth2.3GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1600x1200
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs7.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.2vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewLater, ATI developed a successor to the original Rage 128, called the Rage 128 Pro. This chip carried several enhancements, including an enhanced triangle setup engine that doubled geometry throughput to eight million triangles/s, better texture filtering, DirectX 6.0 texture compression, AGP 4, DVI support, and a Rage Theater chip for composite and S-Video TV-in. This chip was used on the gamer-oriented Rage Fury Pro boards and the business-oriented Xpert 2000 PRO.GeForce4 MX 440 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 7 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games. Still, games before 2003 should be fully playable at max settings....
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-