Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 845GV Radeon Xpress 1200 Series
Red Dead Redemption 2 29622% 35567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29622% 35567%
Cyberpunk 2077 40733% 48900%
Borderlands 3 31289% 37567%
Need For Speed Heat 29622% 35567%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 13511% 16233%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 40733% 48900%
The Outer Worlds 24622% 29567%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 40733% 48900%
FIFA 20 15733% 18900%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 845GV are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The 845GV has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The Xpress 1200 was released over three years more recently than the 845GV, and so the Xpress 1200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 845GV when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 845GV and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the 845GV and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series are the same, which means the 845GV and the Xpress 1200 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

The Xpress 1200 has 4 Shader Processing Units but the 845GV does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-RS690C
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2002vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vs-
Memory Speed167 MHzvs-
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX-vs9.0b
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL-vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 845GV comes embedded on the Celeron, Celeron D, Pentium 4 CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called ???.
Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
ATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body