Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FirePro S9000 GeForce GTX 780
Cyberpunk 2077 131% 30%
Hitman 3 200% 69%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 111% 19%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 104% 15%
FIFA 21 16% 34%
Grand Theft Auto VI 224% 83%
Far Cry 6 234% 88%
Genshin Impact 131% 30%
Battlefield 6 200% 69%
Resident Evil 8 131% 30%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are significantly better than the AMD FirePro S9000.

The FirePro S9000 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro S9000. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 64.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the FirePro S9000. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The FirePro S9000 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 16 more Render Output Units than the FirePro S9000. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 12.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the FirePro S9000. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 780 was released less than a year after the FirePro S9000, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The FirePro S9000 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 780 has superior memory performance.

The GeForce GTX 780 has 24.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the FirePro S9000, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is slightly better than the FirePro S9000.

The FirePro S9000 has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9000 is 1371 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 707 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FirePro S9000.

The FirePro S9000 requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9000. The GeForce GTX 780 requires 25 Watts more than the FirePro S9000 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 780 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the FirePro S9000.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed900 MHzvs863 MHz
Boost Clock-vs902 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO GLKepler GK110-300-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date01 Aug 2012vs23 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
10
1600x900 - vs green tick
10
1920x1080 - vs green tick
9.3
2560x1440 - vs green tick
6.8
3840x2160 - vs green tick
5.2

GPU Memory

Memory6144 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1375 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus384 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth264GB/secvs288.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1792vs2304
Actual Shader Performance66%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units112vs192
Texture Rate100.8 GTexel/svs165.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs48
Pixel Rate28.8 GPixel/svs41.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power225 Wattsvs250 Watts
Recommended PSU-600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM-8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFirePro S9000 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.
It's based on the Tahiti PRO Core (same used on 7950) and therefore offers 1792 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 384-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1375MHZ.
Compared to Radeon HD 7950, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon HD 7950 because Radeon HD 7950 benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9000 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 1% and 5% worse than Radeon HD 7950.
GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W.
Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-