Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 660 Direct CU II Edition | GeForce GTX 780 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 131% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 200% | 69% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 111% | 19% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 104% | 15% |
FIFA 21 | 16% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 224% | 83% |
Far Cry 6 | 234% | 88% |
Genshin Impact | 131% | 30% |
Battlefield 6 | 200% | 69% |
Resident Evil 8 | 131% | 30% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Direct CU II Edition.
The GTX 660 has a 117 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 112 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 660. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 87.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 660. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 660 has a 117 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 24 more Render Output Units than the GTX 660. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 17.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 660. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce GTX 780 was released less than a year after the GTX 660, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 660, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GTX 780 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 144.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 660, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is massively better than the GTX 660.
The GeForce GTX 660 Direct CU II Edition has 960 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 660 is 991 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 1087 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 660.
The GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GTX 660. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 660 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780. The GeForce GTX 780 has been recommended a PSU with 150 Watts more than the GTX 660. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 780 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 660.
Core Speed | 980 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1032 MHz | ![]() | vs | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK106-400-A1 | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Sep 2012 | vs | ![]() | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 8.9
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 7
|
vs | ![]() |
9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | 5.1
|
vs | ![]() |
6.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 3.4
|
vs | ![]() |
5.2
|
Memory | 2048 MB | vs | ![]() | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1502 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz |
Memory Bus | 192 Bit | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 144.2GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 288.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 384 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 960 | vs | ![]() | 2304 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 48% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 80 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 78.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 24 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 23.5 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | 250 Watts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 24 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-3470 3.2GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 660 Direct CU II Edition is a special edition of GeForce GTX 660. The only new feature is the DirectCU II cooling solution which, according to Asus, is 20% more effective than the standard/reference cooler but doesn't affect performance directly and so the performance is exactly like the standard GeForce GTX 660. Gamers will want to buy the OC or TOP versions for superior performance. | GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - |