Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition | GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII TOP 2GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 171% | 166% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 148% | 143% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 140% | 135% |
FIFA 21 | 37% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 281% | 274% |
Hitman 3 | 252% | 246% |
Genshin Impact | 171% | 166% |
Far Cry 6 | 292% | 284% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 288% | 281% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 161% | 156% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII TOP 2GB are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition.
The GTX 560 Ti and the GTX 560 Ti have both the same core clock speed and the same Texture Fill Rate. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 560 Ti and the GTX 560 Ti have both the same core clock speed and the same Pixel Fill Rate. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 560 Ti was released less than a year after the GTX 560 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The GTX 560 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 560 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 560 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.
The GTX 560 Ti has 0.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 560 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 560 Ti is marginally better than the GTX 560 Ti.
Both the GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII TOP 2GB have 384 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the two GPUs have extremely similar stats, so any gaming performance difference would most likely be negligible.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | Fermi GF114-400-A1 | Fermi GF114-400-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | Poor | ||
Release Date | 01 Jan 2011 | vs | ![]() | 25 Feb 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 8.2
|
vs | ![]() |
8.3
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.4
|
vs | ![]() |
6.5
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.4
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
4.4
|
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 1024 MB | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1002 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 128GB/sec | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128.3GB/sec |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 384 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 33% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 33% |
Technology | 40nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 40nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Texture Rate | 57.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 57.6 GTexel/s |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 28.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28.8 GPixel/s |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-2300 2.8GHz | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 2.8GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition is one of the many special editions of GeForce GTX 560 Ti. The new features include a new cooling system and an increase in the core-clock from 822MHz to 900MHz. Benchmarks indicate the performance is around 5% better than the standard edition. | GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII TOP 2GB is a special edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 560 Ti. See the standard version for more information about it. The new features include an increase in the core-clock that went from 822MHz to 900MHz, double amount of video memory and a new cooling system. Benchmarks indicate a 7% performance gain when compared to the standard GeForce GTX 560 Ti. All games, including demanding one's, will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |